OpenSSH icon

Top Alternatives to OpenSSH

Looking for OpenSSH alternatives? We've curated 11 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

PuTTY

PuTTY

Open Source

PuTTY is a free and open-source terminal emulator, serial console, and network file transfer application. It supports multiple network protocols, including SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, making it a versatile tool for remote server administration and development workflows. Its lightweight nature and configurability have made it a popular choice among system administrators and developers for Windows platforms.

Key Features

  • Free and open-source, making it accessible and auditable.
  • Robust and reliable SSH implementation for secure connections.
  • Highly configurable, allowing extensive customization of appearance and behavior.

vs OpenSSH

Free and open-source, making it accessible and auditable. compared to OpenSSH
KiTTY

KiTTY

Open Source

KiTTY is a robust and portable Telnet and SSH client for Windows, offering enhanced features beyond the standard PuTTY client, including session filtering, portability, and advanced scripting capabilities, making it ideal for network administrators and power users.

Key Features

  • Excellent portability and no installation required.
  • Advanced session filtering for managing many connections.
  • Built-in scripting for task automation.

vs OpenSSH

Excellent portability and no installation required. compared to OpenSSH
ConnectBot

ConnectBot

Open Source

ConnectBot is a robust, open-source Secure Shell (SSH) client tailored for the Android operating system. It enables users to securely connect to remote servers, execute commands, and manage systems directly from their mobile devices, offering support for SSH, Telnet, and a local terminal emulator.

Key Features

  • Strong support for SSH with key authentication.
  • Includes port forwarding capabilities.
  • Allows managing multiple sessions.

vs OpenSSH

Strong support for SSH with key authentication. compared to OpenSSH
ZOC

ZOC

Commercial

ZOC is a professional terminal emulator designed for Windows and macOS. It offers a wide range of terminal emulation types and robust features for secure shell (SSH) and Telnet connections, scripting automation, and file transfers. It's a reliable tool for system administrators, network engineers, and developers.

Key Features

  • Extensive support for various terminal emulations including legacy systems.
  • Powerful scripting capabilities for task automation.
  • Integrated SSH client with SFTP support for secure connections and file transfer.

vs OpenSSH

Extensive support for various terminal emulations including legacy systems. compared to OpenSSH
Xshell

Xshell

Free Personal

Xshell is a robust and feature-rich terminal emulator engineered for demanding network environments. It provides secure and reliable connectivity through leading protocols like SSH, SFTP, TELNET, RLOGIN, and SERIAL, offering advanced session management, customization options, and a powerful scripting engine for automation.

Key Features

  • Excellent protocol support (SSH, SFTP, TELNET, RLOGIN, SERIAL).
  • Powerful and flexible session management capabilities.
  • Robust security features with strong encryption and authentication.

vs OpenSSH

Excellent protocol support (SSH, SFTP, TELNET, RLOGIN, SERIAL). compared to OpenSSH
PAC Manager

PAC Manager

Open Source

PAC Manager is a robust and versatile connection manager for Linux, designed to simplify and streamline access to various remote systems including SSH, VNC, Telnet, and RDP. It provides an integrated environment for managing connections, executing remote commands, and automating tasks, serving as a powerful alternative to tools like SecureCRT or PuTTY for Linux users.

Key Features

  • Supports multiple connection protocols (SSH, VNC, RDP, Telnet, etc.) in one application.
  • Powerful automation features (Tasks, Macros) streamline repetitive workflows.
  • Excellent connection organization capabilities with groups and folders.

vs OpenSSH

Supports multiple connection protocols (SSH, VNC, RDP, Telnet, etc.) in one application. compared to OpenSSH
SecureCRT

SecureCRT

Commercial

SecureCRT is a robust and highly configurable terminal emulator and SSH/Telnet client designed for network professionals and system administrators. It provides secure remote access, file transfer capabilities, and extensive session management features for managing servers, network devices, and other platforms.

Key Features

  • Excellent security features (strong encryption, various auth methods).
  • Robust and reliable connection stability.
  • Advanced session management and organization capabilities.

vs OpenSSH

Excellent security features (strong encryption, various auth methods). compared to OpenSSH
mosh

mosh

Open Source

Mosh is a robust mobile shell that significantly enhances the remote terminal experience, especially over unstable connections. It acts as a drop-in replacement for SSH, offering seamless roaming, intelligent local echo, and automatic reconnection.

Key Features

  • Maintains connection over unstable networks, preventing session drops.
  • Allows seamless roaming between different network connections.
  • Provides a highly responsive typing experience with intelligent local echo.

vs OpenSSH

Maintains connection over unstable networks, preventing session drops. compared to OpenSSH
Royal TS

Royal TS

Freemium

Royal TS is a comprehensive remote connection management tool designed for IT professionals. It offers a centralized platform to manage various connection types including RDP, VNC, SSH, and Telnet, enhancing workflow efficiency for system administrators, developers, and engineers managing multiple remote systems.

Key Features

  • Centralized management of multiple connection types
  • Excellent tabbed interface for multitasking
  • Secure and integrated credential management

vs OpenSSH

Centralized management of multiple connection types compared to OpenSSH
JuiceSSH

JuiceSSH

Free

JuiceSSH is a professional Android SSH client, supporting Telnet and Mosh. It offers robust host management, comprehensive terminal features like color support and tabbed interface, and security through encryption. Ideal for network administrators and developers on the go.

Key Features

  • Comprehensive SSH, Telnet, and Mosh support
  • Excellent host management features
  • Feature-rich terminal emulator with ANSI color support

vs OpenSSH

Comprehensive SSH, Telnet, and Mosh support compared to OpenSSH
Bitvise SSH Server (WinSSHD)

Bitvise SSH Server, formerly WinSSHD, is a robust and feature-rich SSH server for Windows environments, providing secure remote access, file transfer (SFTP, SCP), and tunnel forwarding capabilities for businesses and individuals.

Key Features

  • Robust security features including strong encryption and detailed access control.
  • High-performance SFTP and SCP implementations for efficient file transfers.
  • Flexible authentication methods including password, public key, and Kerberos.

vs OpenSSH

Robust security features including strong encryption and detailed access control. compared to OpenSSH

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how OpenSSH stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare