Telegram icon

Telegram Alternatives for Mac OS X

Looking for Telegram alternatives? We've curated 20 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need Mac OS X options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Pidgin

Pidgin

Open Source

Pidgin is a free and open-source multi-protocol instant messaging client designed to connect users across various chat networks with a single application. It's highly extensible through plugins and supports a wide range of protocols including XMPP, ICQ, and IRC.

Key Features

  • Supports a wide range of instant messaging protocols, consolidating multiple networks into one application.
  • Highly customizable and extensible through a robust plugin system.
  • Generally lightweight and efficient on system resources.

vs Telegram

Supports a wide range of instant messaging protocols, consolidating multiple networks into one application. compared to ...
WhatsApp Messenger

WhatsApp Messenger is a widely used free messaging and calling app, available globally. It enables communication through text, voice messages, and video calls, facilitating connections between individuals and groups across various devices and platforms.

Key Features

  • Highly popular with a large user base
  • Effective end-to-end encryption for message content
  • Free voice and video calls

vs Telegram

Highly popular with a large user base compared to Telegram
Tox

Tox

Open Source

Tox is a free, open-source, and secure peer-to-peer instant messaging and video calling protocol designed for strong privacy and censorship resistance. It provides end-to-end encrypted communications without reliance on central servers.

Key Features

  • Decentralized architecture enhances privacy and censorship resistance.
  • End-to-end encryption for all communication types by default.
  • No central servers mean no central point of failure or data collection.

vs Telegram

Decentralized architecture enhances privacy and censorship resistance. compared to Telegram
Viber

Viber

Freemium

Viber is a comprehensive messaging and VoIP application enabling free and secure calls and messages to users worldwide. It offers robust features for both individual and group communication across various devices.

Key Features

  • Strong focus on end-to-end encryption for privacy.
  • Free high-quality voice and video calls between users.
  • Comprehensive set of messaging features including stickers and file sharing.

vs Telegram

Strong focus on end-to-end encryption for privacy. compared to Telegram
Signal

Signal

Open Source

Signal is a secure, open-source messaging application that uses end-to-end encryption to protect user communications. It offers text messaging, voice and video calls, group chats, and file sharing, all with a strong focus on privacy and security. Available on multiple platforms, Signal is a leading choice for individuals prioritizing confidential conversations.

Key Features

  • Strongest end-to-end encryption by default for all communication types.
  • Open source and regularly audited by security experts.
  • Minimal data collection and transparent privacy policy.

vs Telegram

Strongest end-to-end encryption by default for all communication types. compared to Telegram
LINE

LINE

Freemium

LINE is a versatile communication platform offering free voice and video calls, messaging, and a wide array of interactive features to connect with friends and family globally. It goes beyond basic chat with unique stickers, timeline posts, and integration with various services, providing a comprehensive social and communication experience in one app.

Key Features

  • Free voice and video calls globally.
  • Large and expressive sticker collection.
  • Features like Timeline and Public Groups enhance social interaction.

vs Telegram

Free voice and video calls globally. compared to Telegram
Psi

Psi

Open Source

Psi is a robust, open-source instant messaging client built on the XMPP protocol. It's known for its focus on speed, efficiency, and adherence to XMPP standards, offering a clean interface and strong privacy features for secure and reliable communication.

Key Features

  • Dedicated XMPP support ensures compliance and reliability on the network.
  • Strong emphasis on security and privacy with support for encryption protocols like OMEMO and OTR.
  • Lightweight and efficient, performing well on various systems.

vs Telegram

Dedicated XMPP support ensures compliance and reliability on the network. compared to Telegram
Wire

Wire

Free

Wire is a secure, cross-platform messaging and collaboration client offering end-to-end encryption by default for all communication types including messaging, voice and video calls, and file sharing across desktop and mobile devices.

Key Features

  • Strong, always-on end-to-end encryption for all communication.
  • Available on multiple platforms including desktop and mobile.
  • Open source code for transparency and security auditing.

vs Telegram

Strong, always-on end-to-end encryption for all communication. compared to Telegram
Ring

Ring

Open Source

Ring (SFLphone) is a free and open-source communication platform offering secure messaging, voice, and video calls. It leverages decentralization and end-to-end encryption for enhanced privacy across multiple operating systems including Linux, Windows, macOS, and Android.

Key Features

  • Strong emphasis on privacy and security with end-to-end encryption.
  • Decentralized architecture increases resilience and prevents central control.
  • Open-source and free to use.

vs Telegram

Strong emphasis on privacy and security with end-to-end encryption. compared to Telegram
ICQ

ICQ

Free

ICQ is a veteran instant messaging platform offering a wide range of communication features, including text chat, voice and video calls, screen sharing, and group chats. It aims to provide a reliable and feature-rich messaging experience with a focus on privacy and security.

Key Features

  • Offers end-to-end encryption for enhanced privacy.
  • Provides voice and video calling features.
  • Supports group chats with threaded conversations.

vs Telegram

Offers end-to-end encryption for enhanced privacy. compared to Telegram
FaceTime

FaceTime

Freemium

FaceTime is Apple's integrated video and audio calling service, providing a seamless communication experience across Apple devices. It allows users to connect with friends and family through high-quality video and audio calls, including group conversations.

Key Features

  • Excellent video and audio quality
  • Seamless integration with Apple devices
  • Strong privacy and security with end-to-end encryption

vs Telegram

Excellent video and audio quality compared to Telegram
WeChat

WeChat

Freemium

WeChat is a comprehensive mobile app offering instant messaging, social networking, payment services, and access to a wide range of mini-programs. It facilitates communication through text, voice, and video, supports group interactions, and integrates various lifestyle services.

Key Features

  • Comprehensive feature set including messaging, social, and payments.
  • Wide adoption and essential for communication and commerce in many regions.
  • Mini-programs offer access to numerous services without separate app installations.

vs Telegram

Comprehensive feature set including messaging, social, and payments. compared to Telegram
Off-the-Record Messaging

Off-the-Record Messaging (OTR) is a cryptographic protocol designed to provide secure, end-to-end encrypted instant messaging conversations for enhanced privacy and security.

Key Features

  • Provides strong end-to-end encryption.
  • Offers perfect forward secrecy, enhancing security against future key compromises.
  • Includes deniable authentication for plausible deniability.

vs Telegram

Provides strong end-to-end encryption. compared to Telegram
Instantbird

Instantbird

Open Source

Instantbird is a powerful, cross-platform instant messaging client built on Mozilla's XULRunner, leveraging the robust libpurple library from Pidgin. It supports a wide array of instant messaging protocols, offering a unified chat experience.

Key Features

  • Supports a wide range of instant messaging protocols.
  • Allows consolidation of multiple chat accounts.
  • Lightweight and efficient on system resources.

vs Telegram

Supports a wide range of instant messaging protocols. compared to Telegram
Matrix.org

Matrix.org

Open Source

Matrix is an open network for secure, decentralized real-time communication. It provides a flexible protocol for developers to build collaborative applications like instant messaging, VoIP, and video conferencing, enabling seamless communication across different service providers.

Key Features

  • Decentralized architecture increases resilience and prevents single points of failure.
  • Strong emphasis on end-to-end encryption for enhanced privacy and security.
  • Open standard and protocol fosters innovation and avoids vendor lock-in.

vs Telegram

Decentralized architecture increases resilience and prevents single points of failure. compared to Telegram
KakaoTalk

KakaoTalk

Freemium

KakaoTalk is a popular mobile messaging service offering free text, voice, and video calls. Primarily used in South Korea, it provides a comprehensive communication platform with features like group chats, stickers, and a strong emphasis on user privacy and security.

Key Features

  • Free voice and video calls
  • Comprehensive group chat features
  • Engaging sticker collection

vs Telegram

Free voice and video calls compared to Telegram
Rambox

Rambox

Open Source

Rambox is a FOSS and portable messaging and emailing application that consolidates numerous web services into a single, convenient interface. It supports a wide array of communication and collaboration platforms, including popular chat, email, and social media services, offering a unified experience with features like unified inbox and notifications.

Key Features

  • Consolidates numerous communication services into one application.
  • Supports multiple accounts for the same service.
  • Portable version available for use on different machines.

vs Telegram

Consolidates numerous communication services into one application. compared to Telegram
Tencent QQ

Tencent QQ

Free

Tencent QQ (QQ) is a versatile instant messaging and social platform widely used in China and expandingglobally. It offers a wide range of communication tools including text chat, voice and video calls, group chats, and file sharing.

Key Features

  • Large user base, especially in China
  • Wide range of communication features available
  • Supports voice and video calls

vs Telegram

Large user base, especially in China compared to Telegram
Zulip

Zulip

Open Source

Zulip is a powerful open-source group chat application designed for team collaboration. It uniquely structures conversations around topics, enabling users to easily catch up on important discussions and manage information overload. Zulip facilitates secure communication with integrated file sharing and various integrations.

Key Features

  • Excellent at organizing complex conversations with its unique topic-based structure.
  • Helps in managing information overload compared to flat chat systems.
  • Open-source and offers a self-hosting option for greater data control and privacy.

vs Telegram

Excellent at organizing complex conversations with its unique topic-based structure. compared to Telegram
Toky

Toky

Freemium

Toky is a comprehensive cloud-based phone system designed for businesses, offering voice calls, SMS, call recording, and integrations with various CRM and business tools. It provides teams with a flexible and powerful communication platform for customer support and internal collaboration.

Key Features

  • Cloud-based and easy to deploy
  • Integration with major CRM platforms
  • Includes essential features like call recording and SMS

vs Telegram

Cloud-based and easy to deploy compared to Telegram

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how Telegram stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare