7-Zip vs File Roller

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

7-Zip icon

7-Zip

7-Zip is a powerful, free, and open-source file archiving utility. It offers high compression ratios, supports numerous formats including its native 7z, and integrates seamlessly with Windows Explorer for easy file management and encryption. by Igor Pavlov

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
File Roller icon

File Roller

File Roller is the official archive manager for the GNOME desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. It supports a wide range of popular archive formats. by Paolo Bacchilega

Open Source
Platforms: Linux GNOME
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

7-Zip and File Roller are both powerful solutions in their space. 7-Zip offers 7-zip is a powerful, free, and open-source file archiving utility. it offers high compression ratios, supports numerous formats including its native 7z, and integrates seamlessly with windows explorer for easy file management and encryption., while File Roller provides file roller is the official archive manager for the gnome desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. it supports a wide range of popular archive formats.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

7-Zip

7-Zip

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent compression ratios, especially with 7z.
Completely free and open source.
Supports a wide range of archive formats for unpacking.
Seamless Windows Explorer integration.
Includes strong AES-256 encryption.

Limitations

User interface is functional but not as modern as some competitors.
Does not support compressing to the RAR format.
File Roller

File Roller

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent integration with GNOME desktop.
Simple and intuitive user interface.
Supports a wide range of common archive formats.
Easy to use for basic compression and extraction.
Lightweight and resource-efficient.

Limitations

Lacks advanced features found in specialized archiving software.
Limited options for fine-tuning compression settings.
May not support all niche archive formats.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare