7-Zip vs Xarchiver

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

7-Zip icon

7-Zip

7-Zip is a powerful, free, and open-source file archiving utility. It offers high compression ratios, supports numerous formats including its native 7z, and integrates seamlessly with Windows Explorer for easy file management and encryption. by Igor Pavlov

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
Xarchiver icon

Xarchiver

Xarchiver is a lightweight, desktop environment-independent archive manager for Linux and BSD systems. It acts as a intuitive graphical frontend to popular command-line archiving utilities, simplifying the process of creating, extracting, and managing various archive types. by Giuseppe Torelli - Colossus

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

7-Zip and Xarchiver are both powerful solutions in their space. 7-Zip offers 7-zip is a powerful, free, and open-source file archiving utility. it offers high compression ratios, supports numerous formats including its native 7z, and integrates seamlessly with windows explorer for easy file management and encryption., while Xarchiver provides xarchiver is a lightweight, desktop environment-independent archive manager for linux and bsd systems. it acts as a intuitive graphical frontend to popular command-line archiving utilities, simplifying the process of creating, extracting, and managing various archive types.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

7-Zip

7-Zip

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent compression ratios, especially with 7z.
Completely free and open source.
Supports a wide range of archive formats for unpacking.
Seamless Windows Explorer integration.
Includes strong AES-256 encryption.

Limitations

User interface is functional but not as modern as some competitors.
Does not support compressing to the RAR format.
Xarchiver

Xarchiver

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent compatibility across various desktop environments due to its GTK foundation.
Very lightweight and resource-efficient, ideal for older or resource-constrained systems.
Supports a wide range of archive formats by leveraging established command-line utilities.
Simple and intuitive user interface for core archiving tasks.
Reliable performance for creating and extracting archives.

Limitations

User interface is basic and lacks modern graphical elements.
Relies on external command-line utilities for format support, which need to be installed separately.
Lacks advanced features like integrated file previews, extensive repair tools, or highly granular compression controls.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare