AeroFS vs Windows Live Mesh Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

AeroFS

AeroFS is a robust enterprise-grade file synchronization and collaboration platform designed for organizations prioritizing data control and security. by Air Computing Inc.

Freemium

Categories:

Available for:

Mac OS X Windows Linux iPhone iPad

Alternatives Details Website

Windows Live Mesh

Windows Live Mesh was a free cloud-based service from Microsoft that enabled seamless file synchronization and sharing across multiple devices. It also provided remote desktop access and online storage capabilities, facilitating collaboration and accessibility for users. by Microsoft

Free

Categories:

Available for:

Mac OS X Windows Online Discontinued

Alternatives Details

Summary

AeroFS and Windows Live Mesh are both powerful solutions in their space. AeroFS offers aerofs is a robust enterprise-grade file synchronization and collaboration platform designed for organizations prioritizing data control and security., while Windows Live Mesh provides windows live mesh was a free cloud-based service from microsoft that enabled seamless file synchronization and sharing across multiple devices. it also provided remote desktop access and online storage capabilities, facilitating collaboration and accessibility for users.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

AeroFS

Pros

Offers self-hosted deployment for maximum data control and security.
Provides robust end-to-end encryption for sensitive files.
Includes strong file versioning and backup capabilities.
Supports unlimited storage based on available infrastructure.
Utilizes peer-to-peer technology for potentially faster syncs.
Features selective sync to manage local storage.

Cons

Requires internal IT resources for self-hosted deployment and management.
Specifics on external sharing controls are not fully detailed in the provided context.
Peer-to-peer performance can be dependent on network configuration.

Windows Live Mesh

Pros

Efficient file synchronization across multiple Windows devices.
Integrated remote desktop access was a valuable feature.
Hybrid sync approach (peer-to-peer and cloud) offered flexibility.
Free to use.

Cons

Limited cloud storage space compared to dedicated cloud services.
Service has been discontinued, making it unavailable for new users.
Focus was primarily on Windows ecosystems, less useful for cross-platform needs.