ArchBang vs Ubuntu MATE : Which is Better?

ArchBang icon

ArchBang

ArchBang Linux is a simple lightweight rolling release Linux distribution based on a minimal Arch Linux operating system with the Openbox window manager.

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Linux

VS
VS
Ubuntu MATE icon

Ubuntu MATE

Ubuntu MATE is a free and open-source Linux distribution and an official derivative of Ubuntu. Developed by Ubuntu MATE Team

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Linux

ArchBang VS Ubuntu MATE

ArchBang is ideal for advanced users who prefer a lightweight, rolling release system with high customization, while Ubuntu MATE targets users seeking a stable, user-friendly experience with a familiar desktop environment.

ArchBang

Pros:

  • Lightweight and minimalistic
  • Rolling release model for the latest updates
  • Highly customizable
  • Arch User Repository (AUR) access
  • Fast performance
  • Good for experienced users
  • Terminal-centric approach
  • Optimized for older hardware
  • Active community
  • Flexible installation options

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve
  • Not as user-friendly for beginners
  • Requires manual configuration
  • May require more maintenance
  • Less stable than LTS versions
  • Limited pre-installed software
  • Not as polished as mainstream distributions
  • Potential for breaking changes
  • Time-consuming to set up initially
  • May not suit casual users

Ubuntu MATE

Pros:

  • User-friendly and easy to install
  • Stable release cycle
  • Good out-of-the-box experience
  • Strong community support
  • Wide range of pre-installed software
  • Customizable with MATE desktop
  • Great for beginners and general users
  • Regular updates
  • Good compatibility with hardware
  • Well-documented

Cons:

  • Less customizable than ArchBang
  • Not as lightweight
  • Fixed release cycle means older software
  • Less control over updates
  • May require more resources than ArchBang
  • Not as suitable for advanced users
  • Limited access to AUR
  • Less performance optimization for older hardware
  • Can feel bloated with pre-installed apps
  • Not as flexible for power users

Compare ArchBang

vs
Compare Alpine Linux and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Arch Linux and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Bodhi Linux and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CoreOS and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Debian and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Edubuntu and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare elementary OS and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Fedora and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FreeBSD and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Gentoo and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Haiku and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare KDE neon and ArchBang and decide which is most suitable for you.