Areca Backup vs Back In Time

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Areca Backup icon

Areca Backup

Areca Backup is a free, open-source file backup tool developed in Java. It provides powerful backup capabilities including incremental, differential, and delta backups, with support for encryption, compression, and various storage destinations like FTP and local drives. Designed for personal use, it offers flexibility through backup profiles and command-line access. by Olivier PETRUCCI

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux
Screenshots:
VS
Back In Time icon

Back In Time

Back In Time is a robust and user-friendly backup software designed for Linux systems. It creates snapshots of specified directories, allowing users to easily restore individual files or entire directories to previous states. Modeled after Apple's Time Machine, it offers a familiar and intuitive interface for managing backups.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Areca Backup and Back In Time are both powerful solutions in their space. Areca Backup offers areca backup is a free, open-source file backup tool developed in java. it provides powerful backup capabilities including incremental, differential, and delta backups, with support for encryption, compression, and various storage destinations like ftp and local drives. designed for personal use, it offers flexibility through backup profiles and command-line access., while Back In Time provides back in time is a robust and user-friendly backup software designed for linux systems. it creates snapshots of specified directories, allowing users to easily restore individual files or entire directories to previous states. modeled after apple's time machine, it offers a familiar and intuitive interface for managing backups.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Areca Backup

Areca Backup

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open source (GPL 2 license)
Supports efficient delta backups
Robust encryption options (AES, file-by-file)
Flexible backup profiles and scheduling
Command-line interface for scripting

Limitations

User interface is dated and can be less intuitive
No native integration with popular cloud storage services (e.g., S3, Azure)
Requires Java Runtime Environment
Back In Time

Back In Time

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Easy to use graphical interface.
Efficient incremental backups using hard links.
Flexible scheduling options.
Simple and quick restoration process.
Supports various backup destinations.

Limitations

Primarily a file-level backup tool, not for bare-metal recovery.
Configuration can be slightly complex for advanced exclusion rules.
Relies on the file system for efficiency (best on journaling file systems).

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare