BitKinex vs Tux Commander : Which is Better?
BitKinex VS Tux Commander Feature comparision
| Feature | BitKinex | Tux Commander |
|---|---|---|
| Support for SFTP | ||
| Support for WebDAV | ||
| Support for Multiple protocols | ||
| Ad-free | ||
| Dedicated Server Hosting | ||
| File transfer | ||
| Mounting drives | ||
| File-sync | ||
| Directory sync | ||
| Sudo shell | ||
| Auto-saving | ||
| X server | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| RDP Functionality | ||
| Built-in SSH client | ||
| Support for FTP | ||
| Mount FTP drives | ||
| Miller columns | ||
| Cloud Storage | ||
| Sync with Dropbox | ||
| Sync with Google Drive | ||
| Dual Pane Support | ||
| File management | ||
| Portable | ||
| Firefox Extensions | ||
| Legacy Firefox Addon | ||
| Multi-Session | ||
| Port Forwarding | ||
| Dual pane support | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Multi-tabs | ||
| TC plug-in's support | ||
| Batch rename files | ||
| Built-in player | ||
| Screenshot Tools | ||
| Teracopy integration | ||
| Built-in viewer | ||
| Console-based | ||
| File Compression | ||
| Tabs | ||
| Subfolder menu | ||
| Windows Explorer integration | ||
| Extensive customisability | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| File preview | ||
| Split-screen view | ||
| Integrated Terminal Emulator | ||
| Folder Size | ||
| Prevents accidental move to folder tree | ||
| Batch processing | ||
| Windows Compatible | ||
| Compression | ||
| File Searching |
Compare BitKinex
Compare muCommander and BitKinex and decide which is most suitable for you.