Carbonite vs Windows Live Mesh Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Carbonite

Carbonite provides a reliable and easy-to-use online backup service designed for individuals and small businesses, offering automated cloud backup for critical data. by Carbonite

Commercial

Categories:

Available for:

Mac OS X Windows Online Android iPhone Blackberry iPad

Alternatives Details Website

Windows Live Mesh

Windows Live Mesh was a free cloud-based service from Microsoft that enabled seamless file synchronization and sharing across multiple devices. It also provided remote desktop access and online storage capabilities, facilitating collaboration and accessibility for users. by Microsoft

Free

Categories:

Available for:

Mac OS X Windows Online Discontinued

Alternatives Details

Summary

Carbonite and Windows Live Mesh are both powerful solutions in their space. Carbonite offers carbonite provides a reliable and easy-to-use online backup service designed for individuals and small businesses, offering automated cloud backup for critical data., while Windows Live Mesh provides windows live mesh was a free cloud-based service from microsoft that enabled seamless file synchronization and sharing across multiple devices. it also provided remote desktop access and online storage capabilities, facilitating collaboration and accessibility for users.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Carbonite

Pros

Extremely easy to set up and use.
Automated backup runs in the background.
Offers unlimited backup on select plans.
Reliable and stable service.
Good file versioning capabilities.

Cons

Initial backups can be slow for large datasets.
Some advanced features are only available on higher-tier plans.
Can be more expensive than some competitors for basic plans.

Windows Live Mesh

Pros

Efficient file synchronization across multiple Windows devices.
Integrated remote desktop access was a valuable feature.
Hybrid sync approach (peer-to-peer and cloud) offered flexibility.
Free to use.

Cons

Limited cloud storage space compared to dedicated cloud services.
Service has been discontinued, making it unavailable for new users.
Focus was primarily on Windows ecosystems, less useful for cross-platform needs.