cmder vs PuTTY

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

cmder

Cmder is a highly portable and versatile console emulator for Windows, combining the power of ConEmu and embedded msysgit. It provides a seamless command-line experience with a focus on developer productivity, offering features like a tabbed interface, ANSI color support, and built-in tools. by Samuel Vasko

Open Source

Platforms: Windows clink ConEmu Windows Command Prompt PowerShell

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

PuTTY

PuTTY is a free and open-source terminal emulator, serial console, and network file transfer application. It supports multiple network protocols, including SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, making it a versatile tool for remote server administration and development workflows. Its lightweight nature and configurability have made it a popular choice among system administrators and developers for Windows platforms.

Open Source

Platforms: Windows Linux BSD PortableApps.com

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

cmder and PuTTY are both powerful solutions in their space. cmder offers cmder is a highly portable and versatile console emulator for windows, combining the power of conemu and embedded msysgit. it provides a seamless command-line experience with a focus on developer productivity, offering features like a tabbed interface, ansi color support, and built-in tools., while PuTTY provides putty is a free and open-source terminal emulator, serial console, and network file transfer application. it supports multiple network protocols, including ssh, telnet, and rlogin, making it a versatile tool for remote server administration and development workflows. its lightweight nature and configurability have made it a popular choice among system administrators and developers for windows platforms.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

cmder

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly portable and requires no installation.

Excellent tabbed interface and split-screen functionality.

Integrated Git and Bash environment for a familiar workflow.

Superior visual experience with ANSI color support and customization.

Built-in SSH client for convenient remote connections.

Limitations

Configuration of advanced features can be complex for beginners.

Performance can occasionally be impacted by heavy workloads or numerous tabs.

PuTTY

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open-source, making it accessible and auditable.

Robust and reliable SSH implementation for secure connections.

Highly configurable, allowing extensive customization of appearance and behavior.

Lightweight and portable, requiring minimal resources and no installation.

Supports multiple protocols (SSH, Telnet, Rlogin, Serial, Raw).

Basic but effective session management for saving connection details.

Limitations

User interface is functional but can appear outdated and less intuitive to new users.

File transfer capabilities (PSCP, PSFTP) are command-line based, lacking an integrated graphical interface.

Limited advanced features compared to some modern, commercial terminal clients.

Configuration options, while extensive, are presented in a less visually organized manner.

Doesn't natively support tabs within a single window, requiring multiple PuTTY instances for concurrent sessions.