Code::Blocks vs Anjuta

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Code::Blocks icon

Code::Blocks

Code::Blocks is a powerful, free, open-source integrated development environment (IDE) designed for C, C++, and Fortran programming. It offers extensive features for coding, debugging, and building applications across multiple operating systems, catering to both beginners and experienced developers. by Code::Blocks Team

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
Anjuta icon

Anjuta

Anjuta is a versatile integrated development environment (IDE) designed for the GNOME desktop environment, offering a comprehensive suite of tools for software development. by Johannes Schmid and others

Open Source
Platforms: Linux GNOME
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Code::Blocks and Anjuta are both powerful solutions in their space. Code::Blocks offers code::blocks is a powerful, free, open-source integrated development environment (ide) designed for c, c++, and fortran programming. it offers extensive features for coding, debugging, and building applications across multiple operating systems, catering to both beginners and experienced developers., while Anjuta provides anjuta is a versatile integrated development environment (ide) designed for the gnome desktop environment, offering a comprehensive suite of tools for software development.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Code::Blocks

Code::Blocks

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open-source, making it accessible to everyone.
Cross-platform support (Windows, macOS, Linux).
Highly customizable interface and features.
Supports multiple compilers.
Portable version available.
Good integrated debugger.

Limitations

Code completion can be less advanced than some other IDEs.
User interface, while functional, can appear dated.
Initial configuration with compilers can sometimes be tricky.
Anjuta

Anjuta

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Deep integration with the GNOME desktop environment.
Generally lightweight and performs well.
Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
Good set of core features for C/C++ development.
Extensible through a plugin system.

Limitations

Language support for non-C/C++ might be less feature-rich compared to language-specific IDEs.
Community and documentation might not be as extensive as for larger IDEs.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare