CouchDB VS ArangoDB
CouchDB is primarily a document-oriented database that excels in multi-master replication and ease of use, making it suitable for applications that require simple data storage and retrieval. In contrast, ArangoDB is a multi-model database that supports document, graph, and key/value data models, offering more flexibility and advanced querying capabilities, but at the cost of increased complexity.
CouchDB
Pros:
- Schema-free JSON document storage
- Built-in multi-master replication
- RESTful HTTP/JSON API
- ACID compliant transactions
- Easy to set up and deploy
Cons:
- Limited to document storage
- Less suited for complex queries involving relationships
- No built-in support for graph data models
- Replication can be complex in larger clusters
- Not as performant for heavy read operations
ArangoDB
Pros:
- Multi-model database (document, graph, key/value)
- Supports AQL (ArangoDB Query Language)
- Native graph database capabilities
- Sharding support for horizontal scaling
- Rich indexing options
Cons:
- Higher resource consumption compared to CouchDB
- Learning curve for AQL
- Complexity in configuration and management
- Limited community support compared to CouchDB
- Not fully ACID compliant for all operations
Compare CouchDB
Compare Apache Cassandra and CouchDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GridGain In-Memory Data Fabric and CouchDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare H2 Database Engine and CouchDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Microsoft SQL Server and CouchDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare MySQL Community Edition and CouchDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
