CrashPlan vs Copywhiz

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

CrashPlan icon

CrashPlan

CrashPlan provides comprehensive and secure backup solutions for individuals, businesses, and enterprises, offering flexible options including offsite, onsite, and cloud-based storage to ensure data protection and recovery. by Code42

Freemium
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Online Android iPhone iPad
Screenshots:
VS
Copywhiz icon

Copywhiz

Copywhiz enhances Windows file copying with features like flexible filtering, incremental backups, and error resilience, making it more powerful and reliable than the standard Windows Explorer copy function. It integrates seamlessly into the shell for easy access. by Conceptworld Corporation

Commercial
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

CrashPlan and Copywhiz are both powerful solutions in their space. CrashPlan offers crashplan provides comprehensive and secure backup solutions for individuals, businesses, and enterprises, offering flexible options including offsite, onsite, and cloud-based storage to ensure data protection and recovery., while Copywhiz provides copywhiz enhances windows file copying with features like flexible filtering, incremental backups, and error resilience, making it more powerful and reliable than the standard windows explorer copy function. it integrates seamlessly into the shell for easy access.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

CrashPlan

CrashPlan

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Flexible backup destinations (cloud, local, network, peer-to-peer).
Strong AES 256-bit encryption with user-managed key option.
Automatic and continuous background backups.
File versioning for point-in-time restore.
Unlimited storage on certain plans.

Limitations

Initial setup can feel complex for some users.
Pricing can be a factor for larger deployments.
Initial backup of large datasets can be time-consuming.
Copywhiz

Copywhiz

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Advanced filtering options for precise file selection.
Efficient incremental and differential backup capabilities.
Robust error handling prevents transfer interruptions.
Seamless integration into Windows context menu.
Supports scheduling for automated copy tasks.
Queueing functionality allows combining multiple copy operations.

Limitations

User interface can appear somewhat dated compared to modern applications.
Initial learning curve might be present for advanced features.
Lacks built-in file compression or encryption during standard copy operations (some encryption mentioned for backups).

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare