CrashPlan vs Tarsnap

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

CrashPlan icon

CrashPlan

CrashPlan provides comprehensive and secure backup solutions for individuals, businesses, and enterprises, offering flexible options including offsite, onsite, and cloud-based storage to ensure data protection and recovery. by Code42

Freemium
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Online Android iPhone iPad
Screenshots:
VS
Tarsnap icon

Tarsnap

Tarsnap is a secure, efficient, and cost-effective online backup service specifically designed for UNIX-like operating systems, including macOS, Linux, and various BSD flavors. It emphasizes data integrity, privacy, and minimal resource usage. by Colin Percival

Commercial
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD

Comparison Summary

CrashPlan and Tarsnap are both powerful solutions in their space. CrashPlan offers crashplan provides comprehensive and secure backup solutions for individuals, businesses, and enterprises, offering flexible options including offsite, onsite, and cloud-based storage to ensure data protection and recovery., while Tarsnap provides tarsnap is a secure, efficient, and cost-effective online backup service specifically designed for unix-like operating systems, including macos, linux, and various bsd flavors. it emphasizes data integrity, privacy, and minimal resource usage.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

CrashPlan

CrashPlan

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Flexible backup destinations (cloud, local, network, peer-to-peer).
Strong AES 256-bit encryption with user-managed key option.
Automatic and continuous background backups.
File versioning for point-in-time restore.
Unlimited storage on certain plans.

Limitations

Initial setup can feel complex for some users.
Pricing can be a factor for larger deployments.
Initial backup of large datasets can be time-consuming.
Tarsnap

Tarsnap

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Exceptional client-side encryption ensures strong data privacy.
Highly effective data deduplication reduces storage costs.
Command-line interface offers granular control and automation.
Robust data integrity checks prevent corruption.
Cost-effective for users who leverage deduplication.

Limitations

Requires comfort with command-line interface.
No graphical user interface (GUI).
Limited to UNIX-like operating systems (macOS, Linux, BSD).
Initial setup can be more complex for beginners.
Pay-per-byte pricing can be unpredictable for some data types.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare