Cyberduck vs CarotDAV Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Cyberduck icon

Cyberduck

Cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and major cloud storage services. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud. by iterate GmbH

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X Windows
VS
CarotDAV icon

CarotDAV

CarotDAV is a lightweight and portable file transfer client for Windows, supporting WebDAV, FTP, SFTP, and popular cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and OneDrive. It offers a simple interface for managing files across multiple platforms. by Rei's Shed Software

Free
Categories:
Available for:
Windows

Summary

Cyberduck and CarotDAV are both powerful solutions in their space. Cyberduck offers cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting ftp, sftp, webdav, and major cloud storage services. it provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud., while CarotDAV provides carotdav is a lightweight and portable file transfer client for windows, supporting webdav, ftp, sftp, and popular cloud storage services like dropbox, google drive, and onedrive. it offers a simple interface for managing files across multiple platforms.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Cyberduck

Cyberduck

Pros

  • Supports a wide range of protocols (FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Azure, etc.)
  • Clean and user-friendly interface
  • Integrates with major cloud storage providers
  • Ability to mount remote storage as local drive (via associated tool)
  • File sharing and preview features
  • Open source and actively developed

Cons

  • Synchronization features are basic compared to dedicated sync tools
  • Performance can vary based on connection/service speed
  • Some advanced features require paid extensions
CarotDAV

CarotDAV

Pros

  • Supports multiple protocols (WebDAV, FTP, SFTP) and major cloud services (Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive) in one application.
  • Completely portable; no installation required, can run from USB.
  • Simple and clean user interface, easy to navigate.
  • Ad-free experience.
  • Lightweight and low resource usage.

Cons

  • Lacks advanced real-time or scheduled synchronization features.
  • No built-in file preview or editing capabilities.
  • User interface is functional but basic and not visually modern.
  • Limited advanced file management features beyond basic operations.

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare