Cyberduck vs Commander One

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Cyberduck icon

Cyberduck

Cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and major cloud storage services. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud. by iterate GmbH

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows
Screenshots:
VS
Commander One icon

Commander One

Commander One is a powerful and versatile dual-pane file manager for macOS, engineered entirely in Swift. It offers a comprehensive suite of features for efficient file management, including FTP/SFTP/FTPS client, cloud service integration, a built-in terminal, and robust search capabilities, enhancing productivity for both novice and advanced users. by Eltima Software

Freemium
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Cyberduck and Commander One are both powerful solutions in their space. Cyberduck offers cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting ftp, sftp, webdav, and major cloud storage services. it provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud., while Commander One provides commander one is a powerful and versatile dual-pane file manager for macos, engineered entirely in swift. it offers a comprehensive suite of features for efficient file management, including ftp/sftp/ftps client, cloud service integration, a built-in terminal, and robust search capabilities, enhancing productivity for both novice and advanced users.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Cyberduck

Cyberduck

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a wide range of protocols (FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Azure, etc.)
Clean and user-friendly interface
Integrates with major cloud storage providers
Ability to mount remote storage as local drive (via associated tool)
File sharing and preview features
Open source and actively developed

Limitations

Synchronization features are basic compared to dedicated sync tools
Performance can vary based on connection/service speed
Some advanced features require paid extensions
Commander One

Commander One

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Efficient dual-pane interface for faster file operations.
Extensive support for FTP, SFTP, FTPS, WebDAV, and major cloud services.
Integrated Terminal and powerful search capabilities.
Robust features like batch renaming and compression.
Native Swift development ensures performance and stability.

Limitations

Initial learning curve for users new to dual-pane managers.
The abundance of features might seem complex for basic users.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare