Cyberduck vs gFTP

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Cyberduck icon

Cyberduck

Cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and major cloud storage services. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud. by iterate GmbH

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows
Screenshots:
VS
gFTP icon

gFTP

gFTP is a discontinued, free, open-source, multithreaded File Transfer Protocol client with a focus on simplicity and performance, offering support for various file transfer protocols like FTP and SFTP, primarily for Linux and Unix-like systems.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce Discontinued

Comparison Summary

Cyberduck and gFTP are both powerful solutions in their space. Cyberduck offers cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting ftp, sftp, webdav, and major cloud storage services. it provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud., while gFTP provides gftp is a discontinued, free, open-source, multithreaded file transfer protocol client with a focus on simplicity and performance, offering support for various file transfer protocols like ftp and sftp, primarily for linux and unix-like systems.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Cyberduck

Cyberduck

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a wide range of protocols (FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Azure, etc.)
Clean and user-friendly interface
Integrates with major cloud storage providers
Ability to mount remote storage as local drive (via associated tool)
File sharing and preview features
Open source and actively developed

Limitations

Synchronization features are basic compared to dedicated sync tools
Performance can vary based on connection/service speed
Some advanced features require paid extensions
gFTP

gFTP

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports multiple protocols including FTP, FTPS, and SFTP
Multithreaded for faster transfers
Supports FXP file transfers
Simple and intuitive two-pane interface
Open-source and free to use

Limitations

Officially discontinued, no longer actively maintained
Lacks advanced features found in modern clients
Interface is dated compared to contemporary software
Potential compatibility issues with newer systems/servers

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare