D (Programming Language) vs Objective-C

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

D (Programming Language) icon

D (Programming Language)

D is a general-purpose systems and application programming language that aims to combine the power and high performance of C++ with the productivity and safety of modern languages like Python or Ruby. by Digital Mars

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD
VS
Objective-C icon

Objective-C

Objective-C was a robust, general-purpose, object-oriented programming language primarily used for Apple's macOS and iOS operating systems. It combined C's power with Smalltalk's dynamic messaging capabilities.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD Discontinued

Comparison Summary

D (Programming Language) and Objective-C are both powerful solutions in their space. D (Programming Language) offers d is a general-purpose systems and application programming language that aims to combine the power and high performance of c++ with the productivity and safety of modern languages like python or ruby., while Objective-C provides objective-c was a robust, general-purpose, object-oriented programming language primarily used for apple's macos and ios operating systems. it combined c's power with smalltalk's dynamic messaging capabilities.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

D (Programming Language)

D (Programming Language)

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent performance comparable to C/C++.
Strong safety features reduce common programming errors.
Modern language features enhance developer productivity.
Supports multiple programming paradigms for flexibility.
Built-in tooling like a package manager and unit testing.

Limitations

Smaller ecosystem and library availability compared to mainstream languages.
Steeper learning curve for beginners compared to some high-level scripting languages.
Objective-C

Objective-C

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks.
Powerful object-oriented features.
Seamless interoperability with C code.
Dynamic messaging for runtime flexibility.

Limitations

Verbose syntax compared to modern languages.
Manual memory management (before ARC) was error-prone.
Steeper learning curve for some concepts (e.g., dynamic features).
Largely considered a legacy language for new development on Apple platforms.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare