Explorer++ vs Thunar

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Explorer++ icon

Explorer++

Explorer++ is a free, open-source file manager designed for Microsoft Windows. It offers a multi-tabbed interface, a bookmarks menu, and significant customization options. It can function portably and integrates seamlessly with or can replace Windows Explorer. by David Erceg

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Discontinued
Screenshots:
VS
Thunar icon

Thunar

Thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the Xfce desktop environment and other Unix-like systems. Designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins. by Xfce, Benedikt Meurer, Jannis Pohlmann, Nick Schermer

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Explorer++ and Thunar are both powerful solutions in their space. Explorer++ offers explorer++ is a free, open-source file manager designed for microsoft windows. it offers a multi-tabbed interface, a bookmarks menu, and significant customization options. it can function portably and integrates seamlessly with or can replace windows explorer., while Thunar provides thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the xfce desktop environment and other unix-like systems. designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Explorer++

Explorer++

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Multi-tabbed and dual-pane interface enhances productivity significantly.
Extensive customization options for interface and behavior allow for personalized workflow.
Portable functionality is excellent for use on different systems or USB drives.
Batch renaming tool is a powerful feature for managing large file sets.
Lightweight and performs well even on older hardware.

Limitations

Development has been discontinued, meaning no future updates or bug fixes are likely.
Lacks some integrated features found in more modern file managers (e.g., built-in viewers, cloud integration).
Interface might appear dated compared to newer applications for some users.
Thunar

Thunar

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and lightweight
Simple and intuitive user interface
Powerful batch renamer included
Highly extensible through a plugin system
Low resource consumption

Limitations

Core features are intentionally basic, relying on plugins for advanced functionality
Limited built-in support for some network protocols (e.g., FTP) compared to other file managers

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare