Eye of GNOME vs FastStone Image Viewer : Which is Better?

Eye of GNOME icon

Eye of GNOME

Eye of GNOME is the official image viewer for the GNOME desktop environment, where it is also known as Image Viewer. Developed by The GNOME Project

License: Open Source

Categories: Photos & Graphics

Apps available for Linux

VS
VS
FastStone Image Viewer icon

FastStone Image Viewer

FastStone Image Viewer is a fast, stable, user-friendly image browser, converter and editor. Developed by FastStone Soft

License: Free Personal

Categories: Photos & Graphics

Apps available for Windows

Eye of GNOME VS FastStone Image Viewer

Eye of GNOME is a lightweight and straightforward image viewer primarily for Linux users, focusing on simplicity and basic editing features. In contrast, FastStone Image Viewer offers more advanced editing tools, batch processing, and a customizable interface, making it suitable for users needing comprehensive image management and editing capabilities.

Eye of GNOME

Pros:

  • Simple and clean interface
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Good integration with GNOME desktop
  • Basic image editing capabilities
  • Supports many image formats
  • Supports tagging and rating
  • Has a slideshow feature
  • Keyboard shortcuts for ease of use
  • Good performance for viewing images
  • Allows for simple organization of images

Cons:

  • Limited editing features compared to others
  • No batch processing capabilities
  • Not available on Windows or Mac
  • Less customizable interface
  • Limited advanced search options
  • No cloud storage integration
  • Fewer features for professional use
  • Basic image viewing only
  • Does not support advanced tagging
  • Less frequent updates

FastStone Image Viewer

Pros:

  • Robust image editing tools
  • Batch processing capability
  • Variety of viewing modes
  • Supports a wide range of file formats
  • Highly customizable user interface
  • Includes slideshow features with effects
  • Supports metadata editing
  • Performance is generally fast
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Good image organization features

Cons:

  • Can be overwhelming for beginners
  • More resource-intensive than Eye of GNOME
  • Windows-only application
  • Limited integration with Linux systems
  • Some features may be unnecessary for casual users
  • Occasional performance issues with large files
  • Less emphasis on simplicity
  • Can be complex for simple tasks
  • Requires installation, cannot be run portable
  • No support for cloud services

Compare Eye of GNOME

vs
Compare ACDSee and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FastPictureViewer and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FastStone MaxView and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare feh and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Geeqie Image Viewer and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GPicView and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare gThumb and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Gwenview and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Image Eye and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ImageGlass and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Imagine and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare IrfanView and Eye of GNOME and decide which is most suitable for you.