Far Manager vs Thunar

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Far Manager icon

Far Manager

Far Manager is a console-based file manager for Windows, offering a powerful dual-pane interface and extensive customization options. It supports keyboard shortcuts for efficient navigation and file operations, while its plugin architecture allows for significant expandability.

Open Source
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
Thunar icon

Thunar

Thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the Xfce desktop environment and other Unix-like systems. Designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins. by Xfce, Benedikt Meurer, Jannis Pohlmann, Nick Schermer

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Far Manager and Thunar are both powerful solutions in their space. Far Manager offers far manager is a console-based file manager for windows, offering a powerful dual-pane interface and extensive customization options. it supports keyboard shortcuts for efficient navigation and file operations, while its plugin architecture allows for significant expandability., while Thunar provides thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the xfce desktop environment and other unix-like systems. designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Far Manager

Far Manager

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and lightweight due to console-based operation
Highly efficient workflow using keyboard shortcuts
Vastly customizable appearance and behavior
Powerful plugin architecture for extending functionality
Dual-pane interface simplifies file transfers

Limitations

Steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with console interfaces
Less visually intuitive compared to graphical file explorers
Configuration can be complex due to extensive options
Thunar

Thunar

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and lightweight
Simple and intuitive user interface
Powerful batch renamer included
Highly extensible through a plugin system
Low resource consumption

Limitations

Core features are intentionally basic, relying on plugins for advanced functionality
Limited built-in support for some network protocols (e.g., FTP) compared to other file managers

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare