FastStone Image Viewer vs Eye of GNOME : Which is Better?

FastStone Image Viewer icon

FastStone Image Viewer

FastStone Image Viewer is a fast, stable, user-friendly image browser, converter and editor. Developed by FastStone Soft

License: Free Personal

Categories: Photos & Graphics

Apps available for Windows

VS
VS
Eye of GNOME icon

Eye of GNOME

Eye of GNOME is the official image viewer for the GNOME desktop environment, where it is also known as Image Viewer. Developed by The GNOME Project

License: Open Source

Categories: Photos & Graphics

Apps available for Linux

FastStone Image Viewer VS Eye of GNOME

Eye of GNOME is a lightweight and straightforward image viewer primarily for Linux users, focusing on simplicity and basic editing features. In contrast, FastStone Image Viewer offers more advanced editing tools, batch processing, and a customizable interface, making it suitable for users needing comprehensive image management and editing capabilities.

FastStone Image Viewer

Pros:

  • Robust image editing tools
  • Batch processing capability
  • Variety of viewing modes
  • Supports a wide range of file formats
  • Highly customizable user interface
  • Includes slideshow features with effects
  • Supports metadata editing
  • Performance is generally fast
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Good image organization features

Cons:

  • Can be overwhelming for beginners
  • More resource-intensive than Eye of GNOME
  • Windows-only application
  • Limited integration with Linux systems
  • Some features may be unnecessary for casual users
  • Occasional performance issues with large files
  • Less emphasis on simplicity
  • Can be complex for simple tasks
  • Requires installation, cannot be run portable
  • No support for cloud services

Eye of GNOME

Pros:

  • Simple and clean interface
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Good integration with GNOME desktop
  • Basic image editing capabilities
  • Supports many image formats
  • Supports tagging and rating
  • Has a slideshow feature
  • Keyboard shortcuts for ease of use
  • Good performance for viewing images
  • Allows for simple organization of images

Cons:

  • Limited editing features compared to others
  • No batch processing capabilities
  • Not available on Windows or Mac
  • Less customizable interface
  • Limited advanced search options
  • No cloud storage integration
  • Fewer features for professional use
  • Basic image viewing only
  • Does not support advanced tagging
  • Less frequent updates

Compare FastStone Image Viewer

vs
Compare ACDSee and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Adobe Bridge and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FastStone MaxView and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Geeqie Image Viewer and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare gThumb and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Gwenview and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Image Eye and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ImageGlass and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Imagine and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ImBatch and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare IrfanView and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare JPEGView and FastStone Image Viewer and decide which is most suitable for you.