Furmark vs AIDA64 : Which is Better?

Furmark icon

Furmark

FurMark is a very intensive OpenGL benchmark that uses fur rendering algorithms to measure the performance of the graphics card. Developed by Jerome 'JeGX' GUINOT

License: Free

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Windows

VS
VS
AIDA64 icon

AIDA64

AIDA64 is a system information, diagnostics, and auditing application. Developed by FinalWire

License: Commercial

Apps available for Windows Android iPhone Windows RT Android Tablet

Furmark VS AIDA64

Furmark is primarily focused on GPU stress testing and benchmarking, making it ideal for evaluating graphics performance and stability under load. In contrast, AIDA64 provides comprehensive system diagnostics, benchmarking, and real-time monitoring for both CPU and GPU, making it a more versatile tool for overall system evaluation.

Furmark

Pros:

  • Highly effective for GPU stress testing
  • Simple and intuitive user interface
  • Good for overclocking tests
  • Supports various OpenGL versions
  • Strong community support
  • Available for older hardware
  • Customizable stress tests
  • Multi-GPU support
  • Focuses predominantly on graphics card performance
  • Detailed graphical output

Cons:

  • Limited to GPU benchmarking and stress testing
  • Lacks comprehensive system diagnostics
  • No CPU stress testing capabilities
  • Less focus on reporting and analysis
  • Not suitable for general system performance evaluation
  • May not provide power consumption metrics
  • No temperature monitoring features
  • Less versatile compared to AIDA64
  • Can only run on Windows
  • Limited support for some new graphics technologies

AIDA64

Pros:

  • Comprehensive benchmarking tool
  • Excellent for CPU and system diagnostics
  • Real-time monitoring features
  • Supports a wide range of hardware
  • Detailed reporting and analysis
  • Power consumption measurement
  • Compatibility with multiple operating systems
  • Integrated stress tests for both CPU and GPU
  • User-friendly interface
  • Large user community

Cons:

  • More complex compared to Furmark
  • Can be overkill for simple tasks
  • Requires more system resources
  • Longer test times
  • Less focused on GPU performance
  • Interface can be overwhelming for beginners
  • Not specifically designed for stress testing
  • May require configuration for optimal use
  • Higher learning curve
  • Less community support compared to Furmark

Compare Furmark

vs
Compare Cinebench and Furmark and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Novabench and Furmark and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare PerformanceTest and Furmark and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare UNIGINE Benchmarks and Furmark and decide which is most suitable for you.