GameMaker: Studio vs Construct 3

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

GameMaker: Studio icon

GameMaker: Studio

GameMaker is a beginner-friendly cross-platform 2D game development engine with a visual drag-and-drop interface and a dedicated scripting language. by YOYO Games

Freemium
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
Construct 3 icon

Construct 3

Construct 3 is a powerful, browser-based 2D game engine that empowers creators of all skill levels to develop compelling games without writing a single line of code. Its intuitive visual editor and event system make game creation accessible and efficient. by Scirra Ltd.

Commercial
Platforms: Mac Windows Linux Android iPhone Chrome OS Android Tablet iPad
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

GameMaker: Studio and Construct 3 are both powerful solutions in their space. GameMaker: Studio offers gamemaker is a beginner-friendly cross-platform 2d game development engine with a visual drag-and-drop interface and a dedicated scripting language., while Construct 3 provides construct 3 is a powerful, browser-based 2d game engine that empowers creators of all skill levels to develop compelling games without writing a single line of code. its intuitive visual editor and event system make game creation accessible and efficient.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

GameMaker: Studio

GameMaker: Studio

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely easy to learn for beginners due to drag-and-drop.
Fast and efficient for 2D game creation.
Supports export to a wide variety of platforms.
Active community and extensive documentation.

Limitations

Primarily focused on 2D development.
GML is specific to GameMaker.
Subscription model can be costly for full features.
Construct 3

Construct 3

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent for 2D game development without coding.
Browser-based and accessible from any device.
Intuitive visual programming system.
Wide range of export options (web, desktop, mobile).
Strong ecosystem with plugins and behaviors.

Limitations

Subscription-based pricing.
Can become complex for extremely large projects.
Debugging might be less granular than traditional code.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare