Gitter vs HipChat Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Gitter icon

Gitter

Gitter is a free and open-source instant messaging and chat service designed specifically for developers and users of GitHub projects. It provides real-time communication within the context of software development teams and communities. by Troupe Technology Limited

Freemium
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X Windows Linux Online Android iPhone
VS
HipChat icon

HipChat

HipChat is a team collaboration tool offering real-time messaging, video conferencing, and file sharing for enhanced internal communication and project coordination. by Atlassian

Freemium
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X Windows Linux Online Android iPhone Android Tablet iPad Self-Hosted Apple Watch

Summary

Gitter and HipChat are both powerful solutions in their space. Gitter offers gitter is a free and open-source instant messaging and chat service designed specifically for developers and users of github projects. it provides real-time communication within the context of software development teams and communities., while HipChat provides hipchat is a team collaboration tool offering real-time messaging, video conferencing, and file sharing for enhanced internal communication and project coordination.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Gitter

Gitter

Pros

  • Excellent integration with GitHub.
  • Tailored for developer communication with Markdown support.
  • Searchable archives of conversations.
  • Free and open-source platform.
  • Accessible across multiple devices.

Cons

  • Feature set is primarily focused on text-based chat.
  • May lack some advanced features found in broader collaboration tools.
HipChat

HipChat

Pros

  • Centralized platform for all team communication
  • Persistent and searchable chat history
  • Integrated video calls and screen sharing
  • Easy file sharing within conversations
  • Organized discussions using dedicated chat rooms

Cons

  • No longer actively supported or updated
  • Interface could feel less modern compared to competitors
  • Performance issues sometimes occurred
  • Mobile application experience could be improved
  • Breadth of integrations was somewhat limited

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare