GUN vs RemoteStorage

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

GUN icon

GUN

GUN is an open-source, decentralized, and distributed graph database with real-time synchronization capabilities. It simplifies building collaborative and offline-first applications by providing peer-to-peer data replication and a flexible data model. by GUN INC

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Android iPhone Android Tablet iPad Self-Hosted
VS
RemoteStorage icon

RemoteStorage

RemoteStorage is an open protocol enabling per-user data storage on the web. It allows web applications to read and write user data directly to their private storage space, promoting data ownership and privacy.

Free
Platforms: Online Self-Hosted
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

GUN and RemoteStorage are both powerful solutions in their space. GUN offers gun is an open-source, decentralized, and distributed graph database with real-time synchronization capabilities. it simplifies building collaborative and offline-first applications by providing peer-to-peer data replication and a flexible data model., while RemoteStorage provides remotestorage is an open protocol enabling per-user data storage on the web. it allows web applications to read and write user data directly to their private storage space, promoting data ownership and privacy.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

GUN

GUN

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Decentralized and Peer-to-Peer Architecture
Excellent Real-time Data Synchronization
Robust Offline-First Capabilities
Flexible Graph Data Model
Easy to Embed and Integrate (especially in JS)

Limitations

Steeper Learning Curve for Decentralized Concepts
Data Consistency and Conflict Resolution require application-level handling
Ecosystem not as mature as centralized databases
Performance can be network-dependent
RemoteStorage

RemoteStorage

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Empowers user data ownership and control.
Promotes data privacy and reduces reliance on centralized services.
Enables offline-first application development.
Based on open web standards, fostering interoperability.
Reduces backend burden on developers for user data storage.

Limitations

Requires setup of a remote storage server by the user or reliance on a provider.
Adoption is still growing, limiting the number of compatible applications.
Developer effort required to integrate the protocol and handle synchronization.
Potential complexity for non-technical users in managing their storage.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement