Hyper vs Xfce-Terminal : Which is Better?

Hyper icon

Hyper

Hyper is a terminal emulation program capable of connecting to systems through the internet via Telnet or SSH, by Dial-Up Modem, or directly connected by a RS232 serial cable and COM port. Developed by ZEIT

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux Electron / Atom Shell

VS
VS
Xfce-Terminal icon

Xfce-Terminal

Xfce Terminal was developed to fit the need for a lightweight and easy to use terminal emulator in the Xfce desktop environment. Developed by Xfce, Benedikt Meurer, Nick Schermer

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Linux BSD Xfce

Hyper VS Xfce-Terminal

Xfce-Terminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator that excels in low-resource environments, making it ideal for users who prioritize performance. In contrast, Hyper offers extensive customization through plugins and a modern aesthetic, which is more suited for developers seeking advanced features across multiple platforms.

Hyper

Pros:

  • Highly customizable through plugins
  • Cross-platform support (Windows, macOS, Linux)
  • Supports modern web technologies
  • Rich extension ecosystem
  • Beautiful design with a modern aesthetic
  • Supports iTerm2 themes
  • Flexible configuration options
  • Good for developers needing advanced features
  • Active development and frequent updates
  • Supports multiple tabs and split panes

Cons:

  • Higher resource consumption compared to Xfce-Terminal
  • Dependency on Node.js
  • Potentially slower on lower-end machines
  • Complexity can be overwhelming for new users
  • Frequent updates may introduce instability
  • More visually intensive, which may not suit all users
  • Can be overkill for simple tasks
  • Requires additional setup for some features
  • Not as lightweight as traditional terminals
  • Can be less stable due to its reliance on web technologies

Xfce-Terminal

Pros:

  • Lightweight and fast
  • Low resource consumption
  • Simple and clean user interface
  • Good performance on low-end hardware
  • Highly customizable appearance
  • Supports basic terminal features
  • Open-source
  • Active community support
  • Integrated with the Xfce desktop environment
  • Easy to set up and use

Cons:

  • Limited cross-platform functionality
  • Fewer advanced features compared to competitors
  • Less visually appealing than modern terminals
  • Limited plugin support
  • Not suitable for heavy scripting tasks
  • Basic search functionality
  • No built-in terminal multiplexer
  • Limited customization beyond appearance
  • Less active development
  • Fewer updates than competitors

Compare Hyper

vs
Compare cmder and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ConEmu and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Console and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ConsoleZ and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Cool Retro Term and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FireCMD and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FireSSH and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GNOME Terminal and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Guake terminal and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare iTerm and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare iTerm2 and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare KiTTY and Hyper and decide which is most suitable for you.