iTerm vs Hyper

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

iTerm icon

iTerm

iTerm2 is a powerful and highly customizable replacement for the macOS Terminal application, designed for users who demand more control and functionality from their command-line interface. by iTerm Project

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:
VS
Hyper icon

Hyper

Hyper is a powerful and highly customizable terminal emulator built on Electron, offering a modern and cross-platform solution for interacting with command-line environments. It provides a sleek interface, extensive plugin ecosystem, and supports various connection methods including SSH and serial. by ZEIT

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Electron / Atom Shell
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

iTerm and Hyper are both powerful solutions in their space. iTerm offers iterm2 is a powerful and highly customizable replacement for the macos terminal application, designed for users who demand more control and functionality from their command-line interface., while Hyper provides hyper is a powerful and highly customizable terminal emulator built on electron, offering a modern and cross-platform solution for interacting with command-line environments. it provides a sleek interface, extensive plugin ecosystem, and supports various connection methods including ssh and serial.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

iTerm

iTerm

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extensive customization options for appearance and behavior.
Powerful features like split panes and triggers enhance productivity.
Active development and strong community support.
GPU acceleration provides smooth performance.
Free and open source.

Limitations

Initial setup and configuration can be complex due to the vast number of options.
Some advanced features may require a learning curve.
Hyper

Hyper

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly customizable through plugins and themes.
Modern and visually appealing user interface.
Cross-platform compatibility (Windows, macOS, Linux).
Built-in SSH client.
Active community and open-source development.

Limitations

Can have a larger memory footprint compared to native terminals.
Performance may vary depending on system resources and active plugins.
Configuration primarily through a text file may be less intuitive for some users.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare