IrfanView vs F-Spot Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

IrfanView icon

IrfanView

IrfanView is a fast, compact, and innovative FREEWARE image viewer and editor for Windows. It supports numerous graphic formats and offers advanced features for batch processing, conversion, and basic image editing. by Irfan Skiljan

Free Personal
Categories:
Available for:
Windows PortableApps.com
VS
F-Spot icon

F-Spot

F-Spot is a discontiued, but capable photo management application specifically designed for the GNOME desktop environment. It offers a range of features for organizing, editing, and sharing personal photo collections, supporting various image formats.

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Linux Discontinued

Summary

IrfanView and F-Spot are both powerful solutions in their space. IrfanView offers irfanview is a fast, compact, and innovative freeware image viewer and editor for windows. it supports numerous graphic formats and offers advanced features for batch processing, conversion, and basic image editing., while F-Spot provides f-spot is a discontiued, but capable photo management application specifically designed for the gnome desktop environment. it offers a range of features for organizing, editing, and sharing personal photo collections, supporting various image formats.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

IrfanView

IrfanView

Pros

  • Extremely fast and lightweight.
  • Supports a massive range of file formats.
  • Powerful and easy-to-use batch processing features.
  • Available as a portable application.
  • Free for non-commercial use.

Cons

  • User interface feels dated.
  • Built-in editing tools are basic compared to dedicated editors.
  • Plugin installation can be a separate step.
F-Spot

F-Spot

Pros

  • Effective tag-based photo organization system.
  • Basic built-in editing tools for quick adjustments.
  • Batch processing capabilities for improved efficiency.
  • Designed for integration with the GNOME desktop environment.
  • Supports various common image formats and basic RAW processing.

Cons

  • Project is discontinued, no longer actively maintained.
  • May experience compatibility issues with modern operating systems.
  • No ongoing security updates or bug fixes.
  • Editing tools are basic, not suitable for professional use.
  • User interface might feel dated compared to modern alternatives.

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare