IrfanView vs Zoner Photo Studio

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

IrfanView icon

IrfanView

IrfanView is a fast, compact, and innovative FREEWARE image viewer and editor for Windows. It supports numerous graphic formats and offers advanced features for batch processing, conversion, and basic image editing. by Irfan Skiljan

Free Personal
Platforms: Windows PortableApps.com
Screenshots:
VS
Zoner Photo Studio icon

Zoner Photo Studio

Powerful photo editor and organizer with AI features, supporting RAW processing, layers, and non-destructive editing. Streamline your workflow from import to sharing with built-in tools and cloud integration. by Zoner Software

Commercial
Platforms: Windows Android Android Tablet
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

IrfanView and Zoner Photo Studio are both powerful solutions in their space. IrfanView offers irfanview is a fast, compact, and innovative freeware image viewer and editor for windows. it supports numerous graphic formats and offers advanced features for batch processing, conversion, and basic image editing., while Zoner Photo Studio provides powerful photo editor and organizer with ai features, supporting raw processing, layers, and non-destructive editing. streamline your workflow from import to sharing with built-in tools and cloud integration.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

IrfanView

IrfanView

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and lightweight.
Supports a massive range of file formats.
Powerful and easy-to-use batch processing features.
Available as a portable application.
Free for non-commercial use.

Limitations

User interface feels dated.
Built-in editing tools are basic compared to dedicated editors.
Plugin installation can be a separate step.
Zoner Photo Studio

Zoner Photo Studio

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Comprehensive all-in-one solution for photo management and editing.
Robust RAW photo processing capabilities with non-destructive editing.
Useful batch processing features for efficiency.
Integrated direct uploads to cloud services like Dropbox and Facebook.
Facial recognition simplifies photo organization.
Layer support allows for advanced image manipulation.

Limitations

User interface can feel somewhat dated compared to competitors.
Multi-module structure might require acclimatization.
Organization features, while functional, could be more advanced.
Performance can sometimes be challenged by complex tasks or hardware limitations.
Limited third-party plugin support compared to some alternatives.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare