iTerm vs ConEmu

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

iTerm icon

iTerm

iTerm2 is a powerful and highly customizable replacement for the macOS Terminal application, designed for users who demand more control and functionality from their command-line interface. by iTerm Project

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:
Alternatives Details Website
VS
ConEmu icon

ConEmu

ConEmu-Maximus5 is a powerful and highly customizable terminal emulator for Windows, providing a tabbed interface, split-screen views, and extensive configuration options to enhance command-line productivity for developers, administrators, and advanced users.

Open Source
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

iTerm and ConEmu are both powerful solutions in their space. iTerm offers iterm2 is a powerful and highly customizable replacement for the macos terminal application, designed for users who demand more control and functionality from their command-line interface., while ConEmu provides conemu-maximus5 is a powerful and highly customizable terminal emulator for windows, providing a tabbed interface, split-screen views, and extensive configuration options to enhance command-line productivity for developers, administrators, and advanced users.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

iTerm

iTerm

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extensive customization options for appearance and behavior.
Powerful features like split panes and triggers enhance productivity.
Active development and strong community support.
GPU acceleration provides smooth performance.
Free and open source.

Limitations

Initial setup and configuration can be complex due to the vast number of options.
Some advanced features may require a learning curve.
ConEmu

ConEmu

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent tabbed and split-pane interface for managing multiple sessions.
Extremely high level of customization for appearance and behavior.
Supports a wide array of Windows command-line environments.
Portable, allowing use without installation.
Includes useful features like built-in search and SSH client.
Significant improvement over the default Windows console experience.

Limitations

Configuration interface can be complex and overwhelming for new users.
Steep learning curve for harnessing the full extent of customization.
Occasional minor issues with specific console applications or features for some users.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Babun icon
VS
iTerm icon
Babun vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
ConsoleZ icon
VS
iTerm icon
ConsoleZ vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
FireCMD icon
VS
iTerm icon
FireCMD vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
GNOME Terminal icon
VS
iTerm icon
GNOME Terminal vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement
Hyper icon
VS
iTerm icon
Hyper vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
KiTTY icon
VS
iTerm icon
KiTTY vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Konsole icon
VS
iTerm icon
Konsole vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
LXTerminal icon
VS
iTerm icon
LXTerminal vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
PowerShell icon
VS
iTerm icon
PowerShell vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
rxvt-unicode icon
VS
iTerm icon
rxvt-unicode vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Sakura icon
VS
iTerm icon
Sakura vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Chrome Secure Shell icon
VS
iTerm icon
Chrome Secure Shell vs iTerm

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare