iTerm vs Sakura

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

iTerm icon

iTerm

iTerm2 is a powerful and highly customizable replacement for the macOS Terminal application, designed for users who demand more control and functionality from their command-line interface. by iTerm Project

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:
VS
Sakura icon

Sakura

Sakura is a minimalist and lightweight terminal emulator built on GTK and libvte. It provides essential terminal functionalities with a focus on performance and simplicity, making it a solid choice for users who value a clean and efficient command-line experience on Linux systems. by [email protected]

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

iTerm and Sakura are both powerful solutions in their space. iTerm offers iterm2 is a powerful and highly customizable replacement for the macos terminal application, designed for users who demand more control and functionality from their command-line interface., while Sakura provides sakura is a minimalist and lightweight terminal emulator built on gtk and libvte. it provides essential terminal functionalities with a focus on performance and simplicity, making it a solid choice for users who value a clean and efficient command-line experience on linux systems.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

iTerm

iTerm

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extensive customization options for appearance and behavior.
Powerful features like split panes and triggers enhance productivity.
Active development and strong community support.
GPU acceleration provides smooth performance.
Free and open source.

Limitations

Initial setup and configuration can be complex due to the vast number of options.
Some advanced features may require a learning curve.
Sakura

Sakura

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and fast.
Clean and minimalist user interface.
Excellent input responsiveness.
Stable and reliable performance.

Limitations

Lacks advanced features like built-in tabs or split-panes.
Limited customization options compared to some competitors.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare