LXQt vs MATE

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

LXQt icon

LXQt

LXQt is a free and open-source lightweight desktop environment for Linux and BSD systems, designed for speed, efficiency, and customization. It is built from the foundation of LXDE and Razor-qt, combining the best of both worlds to provide a modern yet resource-friendly user experience.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:
Alternatives Details Website
VS
MATE icon

MATE

MATE is a classic, lightweight desktop environment that continues the GNOME 2 legacy. It offers a traditional and intuitive interface while providing modern functionality and performance.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:
Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

LXQt and MATE are both powerful solutions in their space. LXQt offers lxqt is a free and open-source lightweight desktop environment for linux and bsd systems, designed for speed, efficiency, and customization. it is built from the foundation of lxde and razor-qt, combining the best of both worlds to provide a modern yet resource-friendly user experience., while MATE provides mate is a classic, lightweight desktop environment that continues the gnome 2 legacy. it offers a traditional and intuitive interface while providing modern functionality and performance.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

LXQt

LXQt

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and resource-efficient
Highly customizable through modular design
Fast and responsive performance
Modern look and feel despite resource efficiency
Suitable for older or low-end hardware

Limitations

May require more configuration compared to heavier environments
Out-of-the-box feature set might be more basic for some needs
Community support and documentation less extensive than GNOME or KDE
MATE

MATE

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly lightweight and performs well on older hardware.
Offers a traditional and familiar user interface (GNOME 2).
Stable and reliable.
Active development and supportive community.
Includes a set of essential core applications.
Customizable layout and functionality.

Limitations

Visuals may appear dated compared to modern desktop environments.
Extension ecosystem is less extensive than some popular alternatives.
May require some user effort to customize initially.
Requires familiarity with the Unix-like operating system it runs on.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Budgie icon
VS
LXQt icon
Budgie vs LXQt

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Cairo Shell icon
VS
LXQt icon
Cairo Shell vs LXQt

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Enlightenment icon
VS
LXQt icon
Enlightenment vs LXQt

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
GNOME icon
VS
LXQt icon
GNOME vs LXQt

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement
KDE icon
VS
LXQt icon
KDE vs LXQt

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Lumina Desktop Environment icon
VS
LXQt icon
Lumina Desktop Environment vs LXQt

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare