LXTerminal vs Hyper

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

LXTerminal icon

LXTerminal

LXTerminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator specifically designed for the LXDE desktop environment, but adaptable to others. It provides essential features for command-line interaction with a focus on resource efficiency. by LXDE.org

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
Hyper icon

Hyper

Hyper is a powerful and highly customizable terminal emulator built on Electron, offering a modern and cross-platform solution for interacting with command-line environments. It provides a sleek interface, extensive plugin ecosystem, and supports various connection methods including SSH and serial. by ZEIT

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Electron / Atom Shell
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

LXTerminal and Hyper are both powerful solutions in their space. LXTerminal offers lxterminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator specifically designed for the lxde desktop environment, but adaptable to others. it provides essential features for command-line interaction with a focus on resource efficiency., while Hyper provides hyper is a powerful and highly customizable terminal emulator built on electron, offering a modern and cross-platform solution for interacting with command-line environments. it provides a sleek interface, extensive plugin ecosystem, and supports various connection methods including ssh and serial.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

LXTerminal

LXTerminal

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Very lightweight and fast
Low resource consumption
Simple and clean interface
Tabbed interface for multiple sessions

Limitations

Limited advanced features (scripting, plugins)
Less customization options than some alternatives
No split-screen or tiling pane support
Hyper

Hyper

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly customizable through plugins and themes.
Modern and visually appealing user interface.
Cross-platform compatibility (Windows, macOS, Linux).
Built-in SSH client.
Active community and open-source development.

Limitations

Can have a larger memory footprint compared to native terminals.
Performance may vary depending on system resources and active plugins.
Configuration primarily through a text file may be less intuitive for some users.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare