LXTerminal vs rxvt-unicode

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

LXTerminal icon

LXTerminal

LXTerminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator specifically designed for the LXDE desktop environment, but adaptable to others. It provides essential features for command-line interaction with a focus on resource efficiency. by LXDE.org

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
rxvt-unicode icon

rxvt-unicode

rxvt-unicode, often abbreviated as urxvt, is a highly customizable and lightweight terminal emulator known for its performance and extensive feature set provided through plugins. It's a fork of the original rxvt and is a popular choice for users seeking a fast and highly configurable command-line interface.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Linux

Comparison Summary

LXTerminal and rxvt-unicode are both powerful solutions in their space. LXTerminal offers lxterminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator specifically designed for the lxde desktop environment, but adaptable to others. it provides essential features for command-line interaction with a focus on resource efficiency., while rxvt-unicode provides rxvt-unicode, often abbreviated as urxvt, is a highly customizable and lightweight terminal emulator known for its performance and extensive feature set provided through plugins. it's a fork of the original rxvt and is a popular choice for users seeking a fast and highly configurable command-line interface.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

LXTerminal

LXTerminal

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Very lightweight and fast
Low resource consumption
Simple and clean interface
Tabbed interface for multiple sessions

Limitations

Limited advanced features (scripting, plugins)
Less customization options than some alternatives
No split-screen or tiling pane support
rxvt-unicode

rxvt-unicode

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and fast startup time.
Highly customizable through configuration files and plugins.
Powerful plugin system for extending functionality.
Efficient resource usage.
Excellent responsiveness for command-line interaction.

Limitations

Text-based configuration can have a learning curve.
Default appearance is basic; visual customization requires effort.
Requires manual effort to find and configure desired plugins.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare