LXTerminal vs Sakura

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

LXTerminal icon

LXTerminal

LXTerminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator specifically designed for the LXDE desktop environment, but adaptable to others. It provides essential features for command-line interaction with a focus on resource efficiency. by LXDE.org

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
Sakura icon

Sakura

Sakura is a minimalist and lightweight terminal emulator built on GTK and libvte. It provides essential terminal functionalities with a focus on performance and simplicity, making it a solid choice for users who value a clean and efficient command-line experience on Linux systems. by [email protected]

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

LXTerminal and Sakura are both powerful solutions in their space. LXTerminal offers lxterminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator specifically designed for the lxde desktop environment, but adaptable to others. it provides essential features for command-line interaction with a focus on resource efficiency., while Sakura provides sakura is a minimalist and lightweight terminal emulator built on gtk and libvte. it provides essential terminal functionalities with a focus on performance and simplicity, making it a solid choice for users who value a clean and efficient command-line experience on linux systems.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

LXTerminal

LXTerminal

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Very lightweight and fast
Low resource consumption
Simple and clean interface
Tabbed interface for multiple sessions

Limitations

Limited advanced features (scripting, plugins)
Less customization options than some alternatives
No split-screen or tiling pane support
Sakura

Sakura

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and fast.
Clean and minimalist user interface.
Excellent input responsiveness.
Stable and reliable performance.

Limitations

Lacks advanced features like built-in tabs or split-panes.
Limited customization options compared to some competitors.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare