LXTerminal vs Chrome Secure Shell

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

LXTerminal icon

LXTerminal

LXTerminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator specifically designed for the LXDE desktop environment, but adaptable to others. It provides essential features for command-line interaction with a focus on resource efficiency. by LXDE.org

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
Chrome Secure Shell icon

Chrome Secure Shell

Chrome Secure Shell is a robust, xterm-compatible terminal emulator and native SSH client for Chrome. It provides secure remote access to servers directly from your browser, offering essential features for network administration and development tasks within the familiar Chrome environment. by Google

Free
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Chrome OS Google Chrome
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

LXTerminal and Chrome Secure Shell are both powerful solutions in their space. LXTerminal offers lxterminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator specifically designed for the lxde desktop environment, but adaptable to others. it provides essential features for command-line interaction with a focus on resource efficiency., while Chrome Secure Shell provides chrome secure shell is a robust, xterm-compatible terminal emulator and native ssh client for chrome. it provides secure remote access to servers directly from your browser, offering essential features for network administration and development tasks within the familiar chrome environment.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

LXTerminal

LXTerminal

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Very lightweight and fast
Low resource consumption
Simple and clean interface
Tabbed interface for multiple sessions

Limitations

Limited advanced features (scripting, plugins)
Less customization options than some alternatives
No split-screen or tiling pane support
Chrome Secure Shell

Chrome Secure Shell

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly portable due to browser integration
Lightweight and loads quickly
Secure SSH connectivity
Easy host management
Works well on ChromeOS

Limitations

Limited advanced features compared to desktop clients
Basic Telnet support (SSH is preferred for security)
No integrated SFTP/SCP GUI interface
Limited customization options beyond basic appearance

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare