MadEdit VS HippoEDIT Feature comparision
| Feature | MadEdit | HippoEDIT |
|---|---|---|
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Hex Editor | ||
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Spell checking | ||
| Command line interface | ||
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Editable text color schemes | ||
| Native application | ||
| Built-in themes | ||
| FLOSS | ||
| No Tracking | ||
| Privacy-friendly | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS |
Compare MadEdit
Compare Aquamacs Emacs and MadEdit and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Bluefish Editor and MadEdit and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare EditPad Lite and MadEdit and decide which is most suitable for you.
