MariaDB vs Apache Cassandra

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

MariaDB icon

MariaDB

MariaDB is a robust, open-source relational database management system, forked from MySQL. It offers enhanced performance, security, and scalability, making it a popular choice for a wide range of applications, from small websites to large enterprise systems. by MariaDB Foundation

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
Apache Cassandra icon

Apache Cassandra

Apache Cassandra is a highly scalable, distributed NoSQL database designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers, providing high availability without a single point of failure.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD

Comparison Summary

MariaDB and Apache Cassandra are both powerful solutions in their space. MariaDB offers mariadb is a robust, open-source relational database management system, forked from mysql. it offers enhanced performance, security, and scalability, making it a popular choice for a wide range of applications, from small websites to large enterprise systems., while Apache Cassandra provides apache cassandra is a highly scalable, distributed nosql database designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers, providing high availability without a single point of failure.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

MariaDB

MariaDB

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

High performance and scalability
Excellent compatibility with MySQL
Active community and continuous development
Robust security features
Cost-effective due to open-source nature
Flexible with support for multiple storage engines

Limitations

Feature divergence from MySQL over time can impact compatibility
Enterprise-level support requires commercial subscription
Requires separate third-party tools for GUI management
Steeper learning curve for advanced features like clustering
Apache Cassandra

Apache Cassandra

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

High availability with no single point of failure.
Excellent linear scalability to handle increasing data volumes.
Fault-tolerant and resilient to node failures.
Designed for high write throughput and low-latency reads.
Tunable consistency allows balancing performance and consistency.

Limitations

Data modeling requires a different approach compared to RDBMS.
Complex transactions like multi-keyspace ACID are not supported.
Operational overhead can be high for large clusters.
CQL is not a full SQL implementation; complex queries may be challenging.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare