MATE vs LXQt

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

MATE icon

MATE

MATE is a classic, lightweight desktop environment that continues the GNOME 2 legacy. It offers a traditional and intuitive interface while providing modern functionality and performance.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
LXQt icon

LXQt

LXQt is a free and open-source lightweight desktop environment for Linux and BSD systems, designed for speed, efficiency, and customization. It is built from the foundation of LXDE and Razor-qt, combining the best of both worlds to provide a modern yet resource-friendly user experience.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

MATE and LXQt are both powerful solutions in their space. MATE offers mate is a classic, lightweight desktop environment that continues the gnome 2 legacy. it offers a traditional and intuitive interface while providing modern functionality and performance., while LXQt provides lxqt is a free and open-source lightweight desktop environment for linux and bsd systems, designed for speed, efficiency, and customization. it is built from the foundation of lxde and razor-qt, combining the best of both worlds to provide a modern yet resource-friendly user experience.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

MATE

MATE

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly lightweight and performs well on older hardware.
Offers a traditional and familiar user interface (GNOME 2).
Stable and reliable.
Active development and supportive community.
Includes a set of essential core applications.
Customizable layout and functionality.

Limitations

Visuals may appear dated compared to modern desktop environments.
Extension ecosystem is less extensive than some popular alternatives.
May require some user effort to customize initially.
Requires familiarity with the Unix-like operating system it runs on.
LXQt

LXQt

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and resource-efficient
Highly customizable through modular design
Fast and responsive performance
Modern look and feel despite resource efficiency
Suitable for older or low-end hardware

Limitations

May require more configuration compared to heavier environments
Out-of-the-box feature set might be more basic for some needs
Community support and documentation less extensive than GNOME or KDE

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare