Mathematica vs Freemat : Which is Better?

Mathematica icon

Mathematica

Wolfram Mathematica (usually termed Mathematica, Mathematica software suite) is a mathematical symbolic computation program. Developed by Wolfram Research

License: Commercial

Categories: Education & Reference

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux Online

VS
VS
Freemat icon

Freemat

FreeMat is a free environment for rapid engineering and scientific prototyping and data processing.

License: Open Source

Categories: Education & Reference

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux PortableApps.com Discontinued

Mathematica VS Freemat

Freemat is a free and open-source numerical computing environment that is ideal for educational purposes and simpler numerical tasks, while Mathematica offers advanced symbolic computation, a rich set of built-in functions, and extensive support for machine learning, making it more suitable for complex mathematical modeling and professional use. The choice between them often comes down to budget and specific use case requirements.

Mathematica

Pros:

  • Powerful symbolic computation capabilities
  • Rich set of built-in functions
  • Advanced data visualization options
  • Excellent documentation and resources
  • Strong support for machine learning
  • Highly extensible
  • Robust for complex mathematical modeling
  • Supports interactive notebooks
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Widely used in academia and industry

Cons:

  • High cost for licensing
  • Steeper learning curve
  • Resource-intensive
  • May not be necessary for simple tasks
  • Some features may be overwhelming for beginners
  • Can be slow on older hardware
  • Requires a license for full features
  • Less focus on numerical analysis
  • Potentially more complex interface
  • Limited community support compared to Freemat

Freemat

Pros:

  • Open-source and free to use
  • Good for numerical computations
  • User-friendly interface
  • Active community support
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Extensible with external libraries
  • Good for educational purposes
  • Simple installation process
  • Supports 3D plotting

Cons:

  • Limited symbolic computation features
  • Less powerful for complex mathematical tasks
  • Smaller user base
  • Fewer built-in functions compared to Mathematica
  • May lack advanced features for professional use
  • Support primarily through community forums
  • Less frequent updates
  • Limited machine learning capabilities
  • Not ideal for commercial use
  • Documentation less comprehensive

Compare Mathematica

vs
Compare fxSolver and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GMDH Shell and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GNU Octave and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GraphCalc and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Julia and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Maple and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Mathcad and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare MATLAB and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Maxima and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Microsoft Mathematics and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare python(x,y) and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare R (programming language) and Mathematica and decide which is most suitable for you.