mitmproxy vs Burp Proxy : Which is Better?
mitmproxy VS Burp Proxy
Mitmproxy is an open-source and highly customizable proxy tool, ideal for debugging and testing APIs, while Burp Proxy is a commercial tool designed specifically for comprehensive security testing and penetration testing with a richer set of features. While Mitmproxy excels in flexibility and cost-efficiency, Burp Proxy provides a more user-friendly interface and robust security testing capabilities.
mitmproxy
Pros:
- Open-source and free to use
- Highly customizable with scripting capabilities
- Supports both HTTP and HTTPS traffic
- Great for debugging and testing APIs
- User-friendly interface for viewing traffic
Cons:
- Steeper learning curve for beginners
- Limited GUI compared to Burp Proxy
- Less focus on automated security testing
Burp Proxy
Pros:
- Comprehensive set of tools for security testing
- Widely used in penetration testing
- Intuitive graphical user interface
- Supports advanced scanning and automated testing
- Excellent support for various protocols and technologies
Cons:
- Commercial product with a cost
- Heavy resource usage on large projects
- May have a steeper learning curve for advanced features
Compare mitmproxy
Compare apptalk.ninja and mitmproxy and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Zed Attack Proxy and mitmproxy and decide which is most suitable for you.