mitmproxy vs Zed Attack Proxy

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

mitmproxy icon

mitmproxy

mitmproxy is a powerful, interactive HTTPS proxy that allows developers and security professionals to intercept, inspect, modify, and replay web traffic.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:
VS
Zed Attack Proxy icon

Zed Attack Proxy

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is a free and open-source web application security scanner. It helps developers and penetration testers find security vulnerabilities in web applications during the development and testing phases.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

mitmproxy and Zed Attack Proxy are both powerful solutions in their space. mitmproxy offers mitmproxy is a powerful, interactive https proxy that allows developers and security professionals to intercept, inspect, modify, and replay web traffic., while Zed Attack Proxy provides zed attack proxy (zap) is a free and open-source web application security scanner. it helps developers and penetration testers find security vulnerabilities in web applications during the development and testing phases.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

mitmproxy

mitmproxy

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Powerful and flexible traffic manipulation capabilities.
Excellent SSL/TLS decryption for HTTPS visibility.
Highly extensible with Python scripting.
Efficient terminal interface for experienced users.
Open source and free to use.

Limitations

Terminal interface has a learning curve.
SSL/TLS setup can sometimes be challenging depending on the environment.
Zed Attack Proxy

Zed Attack Proxy

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open source, making it highly accessible.
Comprehensive set of features for both automated and manual testing.
Highly extensible through a wide range of add-ons.
Strong community support and active development.
Suitable for both beginners and experienced security professionals.
Can be integrated into automated workflows.

Limitations

Can have a learning curve to utilize advanced features.
May generate false positives that require manual verification.
Resource usage can be significant for scanning large applications.
Configuration can be complex for some advanced scenarios.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare