MLDonkey vs aMule

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

MLDonkey icon

MLDonkey

MLDonkey is a discontinued open-source, multi-protocol file-sharing application acting as a back-end server. It supported various peer-to-peer networks like eD2k, Kad, and BitTorrent, offering a flexible solution for downloading and sharing files across different platforms.

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux Discontinued
VS
aMule icon

aMule

aMule is a free and open-source peer-to-peer file sharing application designed for flexibility and decentralization. Supporting the robust eDonkey and Kad networks, it offers a secure and privacy-focused approach to finding and sharing digital content across multiple platforms.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

MLDonkey and aMule are both powerful solutions in their space. MLDonkey offers mldonkey is a discontinued open-source, multi-protocol file-sharing application acting as a back-end server. it supported various peer-to-peer networks like ed2k, kad, and bittorrent, offering a flexible solution for downloading and sharing files across different platforms., while aMule provides amule is a free and open-source peer-to-peer file sharing application designed for flexibility and decentralization. supporting the robust edonkey and kad networks, it offers a secure and privacy-focused approach to finding and sharing digital content across multiple platforms.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

MLDonkey

MLDonkey

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports multiple file-sharing protocols simultaneously.
Runs as a lightweight background server process.
Compatible with various operating systems.

Limitations

No longer actively developed (Discontinued).
Lacks a built-in graphical user interface.
Requires separate interfaces for user interaction.
Potential security risks due to lack of updates.
aMule

aMule

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports two major P2P networks (eD2k and Kad) simultaneously for maximum file availability.
Available on multiple operating systems (Linux, macOS, Windows).
Open-source and actively maintained by a community.
Decentralized Kad network reduces reliance on central servers.

Limitations

User interface may feel dated compared to more modern applications.
Performance is heavily dependent on network conditions and source availability.
Learning curve may be present for users new to traditional P2P clients.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare