MongoDB vs Apache Cassandra : Which is Better?
MongoDB VS Apache Cassandra
MongoDB is a flexible document-based database ideal for applications requiring rich queries and ACID transactions, while Apache Cassandra excels in high availability and scalability for large distributed datasets with a focus on write performance and tunable consistency.
MongoDB
Pros:
- Flexible schema design
- Rich query capabilities with aggregation framework
- Strong consistency with ACID transactions
- Good support for geospatial queries
- Active community and extensive documentation
Cons:
- Scaling can be complex
- Limited support for complex transactions
- Higher memory usage for certain operations
- Default data distribution can lead to hotspots
- May require more resources for high availability
Apache Cassandra
Pros:
- High write and read throughput
- Linear scalability across multiple nodes
- Tunable consistency levels
- Excellent for large-scale deployments
- Fault tolerance and high availability
Cons:
- Steeper learning curve
- Less flexible query language
- No support for joins and aggregations
- Requires careful data modeling
- Eventual consistency can be challenging for some use cases
Compare MongoDB
Compare GridGain In-Memory Data Fabric and MongoDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare H2 Database Engine and MongoDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Microsoft SQL Server and MongoDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare MySQL Community Edition and MongoDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Oracle Database and MongoDB and decide which is most suitable for you.
