Hazelcast vs MongoDB

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast is a leading open-source distributed in-memory data grid and stream processing platform designed for high-performance, low-latency applications. It provides incredibly fast data access and processing by keeping data in RAM across a cluster of machines, enabling real-time responsiveness. by Hazelcast, Inc.

Open Source

Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux

Alternatives Details Website

VS

VS

MongoDB

MongoDB is a leading free and open-source NoSQL database, designed for modern applications. It offers a flexible document data model, high performance, and seamless scalability, making it ideal for various use cases from mobile to enterprise applications. by MongoDB, Inc.

Open Source

Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Online BSD

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

Hazelcast and MongoDB are both powerful solutions in their space. Hazelcast offers hazelcast is a leading open-source distributed in-memory data grid and stream processing platform designed for high-performance, low-latency applications. it provides incredibly fast data access and processing by keeping data in ram across a cluster of machines, enabling real-time responsiveness., while MongoDB provides mongodb is a leading free and open-source nosql database, designed for modern applications. it offers a flexible document data model, high performance, and seamless scalability, making it ideal for various use cases from mobile to enterprise applications.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely low latency due to in-memory data storage.

Highly scalable and fault-tolerant architecture automatically handles data distribution and replication.

Integrated stream processing engine for real-time analytics and event processing.

Offers familiar distributed data structures simplifying development.

Pure Java implementation integrates well with Java ecosystems.

Flexible deployment options including cloud and containers.

Limitations

In-memory nature means data size is limited by available RAM.

Requires operational knowledge to effectively manage and tune large clusters.

Steeper learning curve initially compared to simpler caching solutions.

Persistence requires additional configuration and can introduce complexity.

MongoDB

MongoDB

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Flexible document data model allowing for easy schema changes.

Excellent horizontal scalability through sharding.

High availability and automatic failover with replica sets.

Strong performance with proper indexing and storage engine choice.

Large and active community with extensive documentation and support.

Limitations

Schema design requires careful consideration to avoid potential issues.

Learning curve for developers migrating from relational databases.

Multi-document transaction support, though improved, requires understanding specific implementation details.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Cloudify vs Hazelcast

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

CouchBase vs Hazelcast

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

CouchDB vs Hazelcast

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

GridGain In-Memory Data Fabric icon

GridGain In-Memory Data Fabric vs Hazelcast

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Advertisement

H2 Database Engine icon

H2 Database Engine vs Hazelcast

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Redis vs Hazelcast

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

RethinkDB vs Hazelcast

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare