mtr vs PingPlotter : Which is Better?

mtr icon

mtr

mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single network diagnostic tool. Developed by BitWizard B.V.

License: Open Source

Categories: Network & Admin

Apps available for Linux

VS
VS
PingPlotter icon

PingPlotter

PingPlotter helps solve network problems. It's a network diagnostic tool that graphs latency and packet loss between your computer and a target. Developed by Pingman Tools

License: Commercial

Categories: Network & Admin

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows iPhone iPad

mtr VS PingPlotter

MTR is a lightweight command-line tool focused on real-time network diagnostics, ideal for quick troubleshooting, while PingPlotter offers a feature-rich graphical interface for in-depth analysis and monitoring of network performance over time. The choice between them depends on user preference for interface type and depth of analysis required.

mtr

Pros:

  • Lightweight and fast
  • Command-line interface allows advanced usage
  • Suitable for troubleshooting
  • No installation required
  • Works on multiple operating systems
  • Provides real-time data
  • Easy to use for basic tasks
  • Supports IPv6
  • Offers DNS lookup
  • Free to use

Cons:

  • Lacks graphical user interface
  • Limited customization options
  • Basic features compared to competitors
  • No alert system
  • Installation can be complex for some users
  • No mobile app available
  • Less suited for non-technical users
  • Limited historical data storage
  • Less comprehensive than graphical tools
  • No advanced integration features

PingPlotter

Pros:

  • User-friendly graphical interface
  • Comprehensive visualization of data
  • Customizable alerts and notifications
  • Historical data analysis
  • Multi-hop tracing with detailed views
  • Integration with other tools
  • Mobile app available for monitoring
  • Export options for reports
  • Suitable for both casual users and professionals
  • Good community support

Cons:

  • Paid version required for advanced features
  • Can consume more system resources
  • Learning curve for non-technical users
  • Requires installation
  • Some features may be overkill for basic users
  • Not entirely suited for command-line enthusiasts
  • May have compatibility issues with some systems
  • Dependent on the underlying OS for performance
  • Potentially overwhelming for new users
  • Not as lightweight as MTR

Compare mtr

vs
Compare Advanced IP Scanner and mtr and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Angry IP Scanner and mtr and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Fing and mtr and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare WinMTR and mtr and decide which is most suitable for you.