MuPDF vs Evince

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

MuPDF

MuPDF is a lightweight, portable document rendering engine and viewer for PDF, XPS, and EPUB formats. Known for its speed and accurate rendering, it's ideal for integrating document display into various applications or for users seeking a minimalist, high-performance viewer. by Artifex Software, Inc.

Open Source

Platforms: Windows Linux Android iPhone iPad Xfce

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

VS

VS

Evince

Evince is a lightweight and versatile document viewer designed for various formats including PDF, PostScript, DjVu, TIFF, XPS, and DVI. It provides a clean and intuitive interface for easily accessing and navigating your documents. by The GNOME Project

Open Source

Platforms: Windows Linux PortableApps.com

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

MuPDF and Evince are both powerful solutions in their space. MuPDF offers mupdf is a lightweight, portable document rendering engine and viewer for pdf, xps, and epub formats. known for its speed and accurate rendering, it's ideal for integrating document display into various applications or for users seeking a minimalist, high-performance viewer., while Evince provides evince is a lightweight and versatile document viewer designed for various formats including pdf, postscript, djvu, tiff, xps, and dvi. it provides a clean and intuitive interface for easily accessing and navigating your documents.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

MuPDF

MuPDF

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Exceptional performance and speed in rendering documents.

Very low memory and resource usage.

Highly portable and works across numerous platforms.

Provides accurate rendering of complex document layouts.

Ideal as a core component for developers building custom document applications.

Limitations

Standalone viewer is very minimalist and lacks advanced features like extensive annotation or form filling.

Primarily a rendering engine; manipulation features are not its core focus.

User interface of the standalone viewer may be too basic for some users.

Doesn't include features like OCR or digital signatures out-of-the-box.

Evince

Evince

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a wide variety of document formats (PDF, PS, DjVu, TIFF, XPS, DVI).

Extremely lightweight and uses minimal system resources.

Provides fast loading and smooth navigation.

Clean and easy-to-use interface.

Includes basic PDF highlighting capabilities.

Limitations

Lacks advanced PDF editing features.

Annotation features are limited.

No support for filling interactive PDF forms.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Adobe Acrobat DC icon

Adobe Acrobat DC vs MuPDF

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Adobe Acrobat Reader DC icon

Adobe Acrobat Reader DC vs MuPDF

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Chrome PDF Viewer Plug-in icon

Chrome PDF Viewer Plug-in vs MuPDF

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Document Viewer icon

Document Viewer vs MuPDF

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Advertisement

ePDFView vs MuPDF

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Foxit Reader icon

Foxit Reader vs MuPDF

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) icon

Firefox PDF Viewer (PDF.js) vs MuPDF

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Nitro Reader icon

Nitro Reader vs MuPDF

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Okular vs MuPDF

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

PDF-XChange Viewer icon

PDF-XChange Viewer vs MuPDF

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

PDF Studio icon

PDF Studio vs MuPDF

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare