Parallels Desktop vs virt-manager : Which is Better?

Parallels Desktop icon

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac, by Parallels, is software providing hardware virtualization for Macintosh computers with Intel processors. Developed by Parallels IP Holdings GmbH

License: Commercial

Apps available for Mac OS X

VS
VS
virt-manager icon

virt-manager

virt-manager, is a desktop-driven virtual machine manager with which users can manage virtual machines. Developed by Daniel P. Berrangé

License: Open Source

Categories: Network & Admin

Apps available for Linux

Parallels Desktop VS virt-manager

Parallels Desktop is ideal for macOS users who prioritize ease of use and seamless integration, making it suitable for casual users and developers. On the other hand, virt-manager excels in advanced features and flexibility, making it a better fit for Linux users and IT professionals looking to manage complex virtual environments.

Parallels Desktop

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface
  • Seamless integration with macOS
  • Supports a wide range of guest operating systems
  • Optimized for performance on Mac hardware
  • Snapshot and backup support
  • Easy to set up and manage virtual machines
  • Good for casual users and developers
  • Regular updates and improvements
  • Offers features like Coherence mode for app integration
  • Provides good support for Windows applications

Cons:

  • Requires purchase (not free)
  • Limited to macOS
  • Not as feature-rich for advanced users
  • Less community support compared to virt-manager
  • Lacks some advanced virtualization features

virt-manager

Pros:

  • Open source and free
  • Highly customizable and extensible
  • Great for advanced users and server environments
  • Supports advanced features like GPU passthrough
  • Good community support and documentation
  • Works well with Linux-based guest OSes
  • Flexible networking options
  • Supports multiple hypervisors
  • Suitable for enterprise use
  • Good for professional developers and IT administrators

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve
  • Less user-friendly interface compared to Parallels
  • May require more manual configuration
  • Not as polished for casual users
  • Primarily focused on Linux environments

Compare Parallels Desktop

vs
Compare bochs and Parallels Desktop and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CrossOver and Parallels Desktop and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare MobaLiveCD and Parallels Desktop and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Portable Virtualbox and Parallels Desktop and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare QEMU and Parallels Desktop and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare VirtualBox and Parallels Desktop and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare VMware Fusion and Parallels Desktop and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare VMware Workstation Player and Parallels Desktop and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare VMware Workstation and Parallels Desktop and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Wine and Parallels Desktop and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Wineskin Winery and Parallels Desktop and decide which is most suitable for you.