PCMan File Manager vs Thunar

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

PCMan File Manager icon

PCMan File Manager

PCMan File Manager is a highly regarded, lightweight file manager designed for speed and efficiency. It is the default file manager for the LXDE desktop environment and offers a clean interface and essential file management functionalities with low resource consumption.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:
VS
Thunar icon

Thunar

Thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the Xfce desktop environment and other Unix-like systems. Designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins. by Xfce, Benedikt Meurer, Jannis Pohlmann, Nick Schermer

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

PCMan File Manager and Thunar are both powerful solutions in their space. PCMan File Manager offers pcman file manager is a highly regarded, lightweight file manager designed for speed and efficiency. it is the default file manager for the lxde desktop environment and offers a clean interface and essential file management functionalities with low resource consumption., while Thunar provides thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the xfce desktop environment and other unix-like systems. designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

PCMan File Manager

PCMan File Manager

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and responsive.
Very low resource consumption.
Clean and intuitive user interface.
Efficient tabbed and dual-pane browsing.
Stable and reliable.

Limitations

Lacks some advanced built-in features compared to heavier file managers.
Customization options are relatively limited.
Thunar

Thunar

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and lightweight
Simple and intuitive user interface
Powerful batch renamer included
Highly extensible through a plugin system
Low resource consumption

Limitations

Core features are intentionally basic, relying on plugins for advanced functionality
Limited built-in support for some network protocols (e.g., FTP) compared to other file managers

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare